Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
In re Friedl
No. 081-12-7525 (SSA Office of Hearings & App. Nov. 21, 1996). ; Clearinghouse Number: 51584
Description
Claimant, Adjudged Blameless in Receiving Benefits in Jail and on Work Release, Need Not Pay Benefits Back
Abstract
The administrative law judge (ALJ) has ruled that claimant was
without fault in having received an overpayment of social security
retirement benefits and that recovery of the overpayment should be
waived. Claimant began receiving benefits in 1982 at the age of 63.
After a felony conviction, claimant was incarcerated from October
through December 1993 and was later placed in a work-release
program until August 1994. In May 1994 the Social Security
Administration terminated claimant’s benefits and charged him
with an overpayment because he had received benefits while
incarcerated. On appeal, claimant argued that he could not be said
to have been "confined" for purposes of social security
law while he was on work release since his basic needs were not
being met by a public institution. Rejecting that argument, the ALJ
held that claimant was overpaid benefits from October 1993 through
May 1994. However, the ALJ found that claimant could not be faulted
because he had not been made aware that he was not entitled to
receive benefits while incarcerated. Furthermore, the ALJ found
that repayment would cause claimant undue financial hardship. The
ALJ held that recovery of the overpayment would defeat the purpose
of Title II of the Social Security Act and should be waived.
