Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
In re Levis
No. 008-50-4244 (SSA Office of Hearings & App. Nov. 22, 1996) ; Clearinghouse Number: 51579
Description
ALJ Waives Recovery of SSI Overpayment
Abstract
The administrative law judge (ALJ) has waived recovery of a $4,089
Supplemental Security Income (SSI) overpayment that resulted when
recipient received a $10,000 inheritance check but failed to cash
it or to inform the Social Security Administration (SSA). Recipient
refused the inheritance but was issued the check anyway. Six months
later she deposited the check in her bank account; she reported
this to SSA. Her benefits were discontinued until she documented
that her resources had been spent down to the $2,000 in countable
resources allowed by the SSI program. SSA sought to recover the
payments made during the six months that she held the uncashed
check. Recipient argued that a nonnegotiated check should not be
considered "available" for purposes of determining her
resource eligibility for SSI and, further, could not result in an
overpayment of benefits. The ALJ held that while the uncashed
inheritance check was considered a countable resource in
determining SSI eligibility, 20 C.F.R. § 416.1201(a), claimant
was without fault in creating the overpayment because she did not
know or could not have known about resource limitations and
transfer of resources, 20 C.F.R. § 416.552. Recovering the
overpayment would defeat the purpose of the Social Security Act
because it would deprive claimant of income required for ordinary
and necessary living expenses.
