Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Placerville Apartments v. Gutierrez
No. WS96-0826 (Placerville, Cal., Mun. Ct. Nov. 25, 1996). ; Clearinghouse Number: 51577
Description
Eviction from Farmers Home Administration Housing Dismissed for Landlord’s Noncompliance with Notice Requirements
Abstract
The court has held that plaintiff landlord may not evict defendant
tenant from a Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) housing complex.
Landlord alleged that tenant had been served in July 1996 with two
warning notices on noise violations and that in September 1996 the
police had been called because of a disturbance involving her
estranged husband. Tenant denied having received the July warnings.
At trial she testified that she never received any written notice
other than a three-day termination notice, which landlord sent her
after the domestic violence incident. The police officer who
responded to the September 1996 incident and was called as a
witness by the management company, testified that only one incident
of domestic violence occurred. Agents of the management company
testified that they could not recall whether they served the
warning notices in the manner required by FmHA regulations. The
resident manager had no record in tenant’s file of proper
service of the notice. The court found that landlord had not
complied with the mandatory written notice requirements of the FmHA
lease agreement and dismissed the eviction action.
