Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Medrano v. Housing Auth. of Austin
No. A-96-CA-329-SC (W.D. Tex. filed Dec. 18, 1996). ; Clearinghouse Number: 51571
Description
Housing Authority Agrees to Modify Section 8 Waiting-List Policies
Abstract
The parties have reached a settlement in this suit in which
plaintiff, a prospective Section 8 tenant, alleged that county
housing authority violated federal law and the U.S. Constitution in
removing her from the waiting list for the Section 8 Existing
Housing Program. Plaintiff had been on the list for three years
when she was told to bring various specified documents to a meeting
to process and complete her application. At the meeting on December
19, 1996, she was told to return to the housing authority office
with numerous other required documents by December 26. Because of
the weekend and holiday, the office was closed on December 23- 26.
When plaintiff brought the documents on December 27, her documents
were refused and she was removed from the waiting list. She
received a letter telling her that she had been deleted from the
waiting list and had no right to a hearing or appeal. Plaintiff
claimed that housing authority violated Section 8 regulations, 24
C.F.R. § 982.554(a)-(b), when it sent her no notice explaining
its decision and advising her of her right to an informal hearing.
She also contended that it violated her rights to due process by
not notifying her of her right to a hearing and by not allowing for
a reasonable time period to submit documents. Housing authority has
agreed to notify applicants in writing of the termination of their
application and their removal from any waiting list. The notice
will include a statement of the applicant’s right to an
informal hearing. Any officer at a reinstatement hearing will be
required to consider the circumstances in each case. Housing
authority further agreed to grant hearings to applicants who were
previously removed from public housing waiting lists and who now,
by a specified deadline, request in writing a hearing. Plaintiff
will be reinstated to the waiting list and given an appropriate
housing certificate or voucher, and the housing authority will pay
her $1,000 in damages.
