Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Babrie v. Copperfield Island Properties, Inc.
No. 96CV0717 (Tex. Dist. Ct. Galveston County Aug. 28, 1996) ; Clearinghouse Number: 51548
Description
Low-Income Tenant Challenges Unconscionable Lease Provisions
Abstract
Plaintiff tenant has filed his petition in this action challenging
certain terms and conditions in his lease contract with defendant
landlord. Tenant alleges that the lease sets forth a $25 late
charge for rent payments made after the third of the month, with an
additional $5 late charge for each day thereafter. Tenant asserts
that, under this provision, in a 30-day month a tenant can incur a
late charge of $155. Tenant also alleges that, under another lease
provision, $35 may be automatically deducted from his security
deposit when he moves out, even in the absence of fault or damage
on tenant’s part. Tenant alleges that the lease contract
appears to state that, if any lease term is violated, landlord has
the right to enter the premises without notice and physically to
remove any persons or personal property from the premises. Tenant
asserts, on its face, this provision appears to do away with state
landlord-tenant laws and judicial eviction procedures provided by
state law. Finally, tenant alleges that the lease contract appears
to state that landlord may enter the apartment for a myriad of
reasons without providing any notice to tenant or obtaining
tenant’s consent. Tenant asserts that landlord has already
attempted to evict him illegally and he fears that landlord will
attempt to enforce one of the challenged lease provisions against
him in the near future. Tenant claims that landlord has violated
state law by incorporating unreasonable, unconscionable, and
illegal terms in the lease contract. He seeks declaratory judgment,
an order permanently enjoining landlord from using or enforcing the
challenged lease provisions and requiring landlord to provide
current and past tenants with copies of final orders in this case,
nominal damages, costs, and attorney fees.
