Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
FCC National Bank Assignee of the First National Bank of Chicago v. Doe
006050-95 (N.J. Super. Ct. Middlesex County filed June 22, 1995). ; Clearinghouse Number: 51172
Description
Consumer Counterclaims That Bank Misrepresented Terms of Credit Card Insurance
Abstract
Defendant consumer has filed his answer and counterclaim in this
collection action. Plaintiff bank sued to collect an outstanding
balance on defendant’s credit card. Defendant alleges that
bank sold him an insurance plan that, bank represented, would
protect him in the event he became unemployed; bank further
represented that insurance benefits would be paid until his balance
was paid off, he returned to work, or he reached the policy limit
of $10,000, whichever happened first. After defendant became
unemployed, he owed a balance on his credit card of less than
$10,000. He maintains that, although he received insurance benefits
for approximately five years during which he continued to be
unemployed, the balance on his credit card account continued to
grow; bank’s insurance plan is structured so that it would
never pay off the balance on his account, no matter how long he
remained unemployed; he would owe less money if he had not
purchased the insurance; and bank’s actions constitute
unconscionable commercial practices, deception, fraud, false
promises, or misrepresentations, in violation of state law.
Defendant seeks treble damages, costs, and attorney fees.
