Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
In re J.E.S.
09-95-198 CV (Tex. Ct. App. Feb. 29, 1996) ; Clearinghouse Number: 51137
Description
Custodial Mother Did Not Receive Sufficient Notice of Final Hearing on Father's Motion to Modify Custody
Abstract
The Texas Court of Appeals has reversed the lower court's
judgment appointing appellee father temporary sole managing
conservator of the parties' child. Appellant mother and
appellee father were divorced in Louisiana. Although the parties
have two children, in the divorce decree only one child was
referred to as being a child of the marriage. After father
relocated to Texas, he asked the Texas court for modification of
the parent-child relationship as to the second child. Mother
received copies of father's motion to modify and his
application to extend protective orders, which included a copy of
the court's unsigned order setting the matter for trial, from
father's counsel. However, she never received notice of the
trial date from the clerk of the court. Failing to appear at trial,
she received a default judgment, to set which aside she filed a
petition for writ of error. The appellate court found the letter
mother received to be misleading in suggesting that both the
custody modification and the protective order matters were set for
trial on the same date. Finding nothing in the record to verify
mother's receipt of notice of the hearing on father's
motion, the court reversed the lower court's order and remanded
for a new trial.
