Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Wilson v. Brummitt
95 F 2566 (Ill. Cir. Ct. Lake County Feb. 15, 1996) ; Clearinghouse Number: 51128
Description
Motion Denied to Dismiss Putative Father's Paternity Action for Failure to Register
Abstract
The court has denied respondent mother's motion to dismiss this
paternity action. Petitioner believes that he is the father of
respondent's child. Before the child's birth, petitioner
and respondent contacted an adoption agency and selected a couple
whom they felt might be appropriate adoptive parents. However,
after the child's birth, petitioner told respondent that he
could not go through with the adoption. Nonetheless, respondent
gave the child to the prospective adoptive couple. When petitioner
was served with legal documents in connection with the child's
adoption, he filed a declaration of paternity, entered an
appearance in the adoption action, and filed this action to
establish his paternity under the state's parentage act.
Respondent argued that petitioner's failure to file with the
state's putative father registry within 30 days of the
child's birth barred him from bringing suit to establish
paternity. Petitioner claimed that barring him from establishing
paternity for that reason would deprive him of due process and
equal protection; his right to establish his parental interest in
the child is a fundamental liberty interest and a property right
protected by the due process clauses of both the federal and state
constitutions; and the state's adoption act does not by its
terms bar his paternity action for failing to register with the
putative father registry. The court held that under a statutory
construction analysis the adoption act provisions regarding the
putative father registry do not apply to paternity actions brought
under the parentage act.
