Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
McNeely v. Brown
95-1000 (Vet. App. filed April 1, 1996) ; Clearinghouse Number: 51117
Description
Surviving Spouse Cites New Evidence of Veteran's Service-Connected Gastrointestinal Disease
Abstract
Appellant, the surviving spouse of a veteran, has filed her brief
appealing the denial by the Department of Veterans Administration
(VA) of veteran's application for pension and compensation
benefits. During active wartime military service, veteran
experienced gastrointestinal bleeding. He was discharged due to a
disability purported to be "psychoneurosis, hypochondrial
type, severe." His multiple applications for VA benefits
beginning in 1944 were denied because he did not meet the 90-day
requirement of service and/or the alternative criteria for
discharge due to a service-connected disability. Appellant appealed
veteran's 1990 application denial to the Board of Veterans
Appeals, which determined that the new evidence in support of
reopening his claim, namely, medical treatises establishing a link
between veteran's gastrointestinal bleeding and medications
received during military hospitalization, was not material and
refused to reopen the claim. On appeal, appellant argues that
VA's prior denials of the existence of gastric ulcer and
gastrointestinal bleeding erred in that they did not apply the
legal presumptions required by the relevant statutes and
regulations in effect at the time. Appellant also argues that, even
if they had not been clearly and unmistakably erroneous, new and
material evidence of a link between medications veteran received
during service and the gastrointestinal disease he suffered
demonstrates a causal service connection.
