Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Barnett v. Thorn Americas
94 M1 013550 (Ill. Cir. Ct. Cook County May 24, 1995) ; Clearinghouse Number: 51108
Description
Summary Judgment Denied in Action Against Unconscionably High Prices Charged by Rent-to-Own Store
Abstract
The court has denied defendant "rent-to-own" store's
motion for summary judgment in this action against defendant's
business practices. Plaintiff consumer alleges that defendant
"rented" her a stereo and a curio cabinet at
unconscionably high prices; defendant failed to disclose key terms
of the transactions, such as the full price of ownership; and
defendant's actions violated the state's rental purchase
agreement act and consumer fraud act. Moving for summary judgment,
defendant argued that plaintiff suffered no damages because she
refused to pay the entire amount on the contracts at issue.
Plaintiff, noting that defendant filed a counterclaim against
plaintiff for the unpaid amount, argued that an obligation to repay
a debt constitutes damages that can be recovered in an affirmative
lawsuit. Plaintiff also argued that her allegations that the prices
charged by defendant were unconscionably high and that defendant
concealed the true cost of the merchandise and the excessive price
charged should not be subject to a summary judgment motion because
they involved questions of fact. The court denied defendant's
motion.
