Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Falk ex rel. Samolyk v. Chater
No. 2:92cv807 (AHN) (D. Conn. Oct. 27, 1995). ; Clearinghouse Number: 50932
Description
Claimant Entitled to Medicare Coverage for Post-Hospital Skilled Nursing Facility Care
Abstract
Adopting the magistrate’s recommendation, the district court
has held that plaintiff, an 82-year-old woman admitted to a nursing
facility following a 95-day hospitalization, is entitled to
Medicare coverage for skilled nursing facility care. Upon
admission, plaintiff was diagnosed with a fourth-degree pressure
sore, hyponatremia, paraplegia, proteus mirabilis sepsis (a
bacterial infection), atonic bladder with chronic indwelling
catheter, congestive heart failure, and senile dementia. At the
facility, she received daily injections of vitamin B-12 and various
oral medications, her indwelling catheter was irrigated daily and
replaced monthly, she was treated for decubitus ulcers and
recurrent fevers, and she received physical therapy. Finding that
plaintiff did not require or receive a skilled nursing facility
level of care, the administrative law judge (ALJ) denied Medicare
coverage for her 120-day stay at the facility. On appeal, the
magistrate found that plaintiff had received skilled care in the
form of assessment of urine, monitoring for and treatment of
urinary tract infection, irrigation and replacement of catheters,
assessment of the effects of medication and of skin integrity, and
treatment of decubitus ulcers. Considered in conjunction with her
other medical problems, including paraplegia, senile dementia,
malnutrition, and inability to leave her bed without the use of a
hydraulic lift, the record demonstrated that plaintiff required and
received a skilled level of care during the period in question.
Counsel notes that, while the ALJ based his decision largely on
plaintiff’s doctor’s intermediate care facility
certification, the magistrate found that the Social Security Act
does not distinguish between skilled nursing facility and
intermediate care facility levels of care for determining Medicare
coverage.
Additional Information
Files
- Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for an Order Reversing the Decision of the Secretary
- Defendant's Memorandum in Support of Motion for Order Affirming the Decision of the Secretary and in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Order Reversing the Decision of the Secretary
- Recommended Ruling on Plaintiff's Motion for Order Reversing the Decision of the Secretary and Defendant's Motion for Order Affirming the Decision of the Secretary and Order
- Judgment
