Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Ivory v. County of Yuba
No. 054694 (Cal. Super. Ct. Yuba County May 1, 1995) ; Clearinghouse Number: 50786
Description
County Ordered to Plan for Low-Income Residents’ Housing Needs
Abstract
The court has granted plaintiffs’ motion for a writ of
mandate and ordered defendant county to plan for affordable housing
needs. Plaintiffs, low-income residents of the county, alleged that
the housing element of defendant’s general plan did not
adequately address affordable housing needs and was out of
compliance with the state’s housing element law. Plaintiffs
also alleged that a specific plan covering a portion of defendant
county was inadequate per se because it was adopted when the
general plan was inadequate. Finally, plaintiffs alleged that the
specific plan was inconsistent with the adopted housing element
because the specific plan did not provide for affordable housing
for low-income households, failed to address the special housing
needs identified in the housing element law, and did not assure
needed infrastructure. The court ordered defendant to amend the
general plan’s housing element to include analysis of
“at-risk” assisted housing units, analysis of
constraints to the development of affordable housing, and a plan to
mitigate those constraints, including infrastructure capacity
limitations. In addition, the court ordered defendant to repeal a
county ordinance specifying mobile home siding and roofing
requirements. Finally, the court enjoined defendant from
implementing the specific plan until it is amended to be consistent
with the amended housing element. In addition, the court awarded
plaintiffs over $77,000 in attorney fees and costs.
Additional Information
Files
- First Amended Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief
- Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Petition for Writ of Mandate
- Plaintiffs’ Objection to Points and Authorities of C.A. Yuba, Inc., in Opposition to Petition for Writ of Mandate
- Petitioners’ Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Reply to Intervenor’s Opposition to Petition for Writ of Mandate
- Order Granting Petitioners’ Request for Peremptory Writ of Mandate and Judgment Thereon for Petitioners
- Peremptory Writ of Mandate
- Petitioners’ Opposition to Respondents’ Motion for Reconsideration
- Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Petitioners’ Motion for Order to Correct Clerical Error in Judgment and Amend Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc
- Petitioners’ Notice of Motion and Motion for Award of Attorneys’ Fees
- Stipulation and Order re Amendment to Yuba County Housing Element and Plumas Lake Specific Plan
- Reply Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Petitioners’ Motion for Award of Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees
- Ruling on Petitioners’ Motion for Award of Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees
