Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Hart v. Chater
(SSA Mar. 11, 1996) ; Clearinghouse Number: 50779
Description
Social Security Administration Commissioner Grants Survivors’ Benefits to Child Conceived After Her Father’s Death
Abstract
After consulting with the Department of Justice, the Commissioner
of the Social Security Administration (SSA) has decided to grant
claimant social security survivors’ benefits. Claimant is a
four-year-old child who was conceived by gamete intrafallopian
transfer three months after her father’s death.
Claimant’s father, facing medical treatment likely to render
him sterile, had donated sperm before his death with the intent
that his wife be impregnated with it. After claimant’s birth,
claimant’s mother applied for survivors’ benefits for
herself and her child. Finding that claimant was not the
"natural child" of the deceased wage earner, SSA denied
the claim. In federal court, claimant alleged that the Social
Security Act and provisions of Louisiana’s intestate
succession statutes denied legitimacy, heirship, and
survivors’ benefits to children who are born through
reproductive technologies and whose conception occurs after the
father’s death. The Commissioner of SSA found that recent
advances in modern medical practice necessitated a review of
current laws and regulations to ensure equitable social security
payments in cases such as this and that denying claimant benefits
pending resolution of the significant policy issues this raised
would be inappropriate.
Additional Information
Files
- Memorandum Filed on Behalf of State Defendants, Governor M.Judgment "Mike" Foster and Attorney General Richard P. Ieyoub, in Support of Motion to Dismiss
- Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
- Motion for Summary Judgment on Behalf of State Defendants and Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
- Response of Defendant Chater to the State Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
- Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and in Support of Defendant Chater’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
- Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant Chater’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment
- Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law in Support of Her Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss All Claims Against Defendants Foster and Leyoub
- Statement of Shirley S. Chater Commissioner of Social Security (Awarding Benefits)
