Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Sorrells v. Chater
No. A-94-CA-623-SS (W.D. Tex. May 26, 1995) ; Clearinghouse Number: 50754
Description
Child’s SSI Claim Remanded Under Sentence Four for Reconsideration of Evidence of Behavioral Impairments
Abstract
Adopting the magistrate’s recommendation, the district court
has remanded this disability claim under sentence four of 42 U.S.C.
§ 405(g). Plaintiff, a child claiming SSI benefits, alleged
disability due to mental retardation. His application was denied,
and he appealed. At the administrative hearing, the medical advisor
testified that claimant was only moderately impaired in the two
domains of motor development and concentration, persistence, and
pace. Following the hearing, the administrative law judge (ALJ)
directed that plaintiff undergo a consultative examination, and
school records were also submitted to the ALJ. These records and
the examination revealed that plaintiff engaged in violent and
antisocial behavior and had significant communication difficulties.
Nevertheless, the ALJ upheld the denial, and the Appeals Council
affirmed. On appeal, plaintiff argued that the ALJ’s decision
was not supported by substantial evidence. Alternatively, plaintiff
argued that the ALJ had erroneously evaluated the evidence in
determining that plaintiff was only moderately impaired in two
domains. Finding that the ALJ had been inconsistent in his
evaluation of the degree of limitation experienced by plaintiff in
the various domains, the court granted plaintiff’s motion for
a remand under sentence four. The court was particularly troubled
by the ALJ’s determination that plaintiff’s behavior
was less than moderately impaired despite his belligerent and
dangerous conduct.
