Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Kramer v. Lipscomb
No. 95-XX-00003 (Ky. Cir. Ct. Kenton County May 24, 1995) ; Clearinghouse Number: 50723
Description
Seven-Day Notice Without Advice to Tenants of Right to Cure Breach Is Insufficient
Abstract
The appellate court has reversed the lower court’s eviction
of defendant tenants. Plaintiff landlord had alleged that tenants
breached the lease by failing to pay rent. At trial, landlord
produced a written “seven-day” notice that he said he
had delivered to tenants; it stated that the rent had not been
paid. Tenants testified that the check had been put in the mail.
The trial court issued judgment for landlord. On appeal, the
appellate court held that the “official, seven-day
notice” from landlord was insufficient because it had not
advised tenants of their right to cure the alleged breach by paying
the rent within seven days. Counsel notes that, while adopting
tenants’ construction of the state’s Uniform
Residential Landlord Tenant Act (URLTA), the court tacitly rejected
tenants’ argument that the trial court could not recognize
any seven-day notice as legally sufficient because no copy of the
city ordinance adopting the URLTA had been introduced into evidence
and because the trial court could not have taken judicial notice of
the city ordinance.
