Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
James v. Bulk Lift Int’l, Inc.
No. 7-94-CIV-77-F-2 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 3, 1995) ; Clearinghouse Number: 50717
Description
Challenge to Employer’s Failure to Give Employees Notice Prior to Closing Plant Is Settled
Abstract
The parties have settled this class action challenging defendant
employer’s failure to give plaintiff former employees 60
days’ notice prior to closing the plant. Plaintiffs alleged
that defendant failed to notify them before closing the plant, in
violation of the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act,
29 U.S.C. §§ 2101 et seq. In its motion to dismiss,
defendant argued that all of the employees had been discharged for
cause and therefore had not suffered any “employment
loss” as defined at 29 U.S.C. § 2101(a)(6). The court
found that defendant’s argument might be appropriate on a
motion for summary judgment after adequate time for discovery, but
that it was outside the scope of a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss.
Accordingly, the court denied defendant’s motion and granted
plaintiffs’ motion to certify a class of 76 former employees.
Subsequently, the parties settled. Defendant agreed to pay
plaintiffs approximately $72,000 in back pay and $5,000 in attorney
fees.
Additional Information
Files
- Complaint
- Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
- Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
- Plaintiff’s Memorandum of Law in Support of His Motion for Class Certification
- Plaintiff’s Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
- Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
- Plaintiff’s Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of His Motion for Class Certification
- Plaintiff’s First Request for Production of Documents for Inspection and Copying
- Order (on motions to dismiss and for class certification)
- Answer to Complaint
- First Affirmative Defense
- Consent Judgment
- Order
