Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Children’s Alliance v. City of Bellevue, Wash.
No. 95-3-0011 (Wash. Cent. Puget Sound Growth Planning Hearings Bd. July 26, 1995) ; Clearinghouse Number: 50708
Description
State Hearings Board Finds That City Ordinance Restricting Group Homes for Children Violates State Planning Act
Abstract
The Central Puget Sound Growth Management Hearings Board has held
that respondent City of Bellevue’s group home ordinance
violates the state planning act. The ordinance, among other things,
(1) outlaws group homes for children from all residential zones;
(2) imposes low occupancy maximums; (3) requires group homes for
children to be at least 1,000 feet away from any other group home;
and (4) requires group homes and families with foster children to
register with the city. Petitioners, a minor child and three child
welfare and housing development organizations, alleged that the
ordinance violated state law. In a unanimous decision, the board
held that the ordinance violated a state law prohibiting counties
or cities from enacting an ordinance that “treats a
residential structure occupied by persons with handicaps
differently than a similar residential structure occupied by a
family or other unrelated individual.” The ordinance also
violates a state law that prohibits the adoption of a comprehensive
plan or development regulation that precludes the siting of
essential public facilities. Group homes for children are essential
public facilities and that their restriction to commercial zones
made their siting anywhere in Bellevue impracticable. Finally, the
ordinance violates state law requiring counties and cities to adopt
a comprehensive plan and development regulations that are
consistent with and implement that plan. The ordinance conflicts
with provisions of Bellevue’s comprehensive plan, including
ones stating that “special needs housing should be dispersed
throughout the community and integrated into the
neighborhoods.” The board ordered the city to repeal or amend
the offending parts of the ordinance. Counsel notes that the city
intends to seek judicial review of the board’s decision. In
addition, a federal suit challenging the ordinance,
Children’s Alliance v. City of Bellevue, Wash., No. C95-0905
(W.D. Wash. filed June 15, 1995) (Clearinghouse No. 50,707),
continues.
Additional Information
Files
- First Amended Petition for Review
- City of Bellevue’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Legal Issues 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 11
- Petitioners’ Response to City of Bellevue’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
- Order Partially Granting Bellevue’s Dispositive Motion
- Petitioners’ Prehearing Brief
- Respondent City of Bellevue’s Hearing Brief
- Final Decision and Order
