Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Children’s Alliance v. City of Bellevue
No. C95-0905Z (W.D. Wash. June 13, 1997) ; Clearinghouse Number: 50707
Description
City Ordinance Restricting Group Homes for Children Is Invalidated
Abstract
The district court has held that defendant city’s ordinance
restricting the siting and operation of group homes for children
violated the Fair Housing Act and state antidiscrimination law. The
ordinance challenged by plaintiffs—three nonprofit
organizations and a minor child—removed the outright ban on
group homes in residential areas but continued to treat group care
facilities differently by placing them in separate classes. Group
homes for children were excluded from residential zones if the
home, inter alia, was not the "regular family abode" of
the person providing the care and holding the license or persons
who fit the ordinance’s definition of
"dangerousness." The court held that the Fair Housing
Act’s provision on "familial status" protected
children in group homes and that the ordinance constituted
intentional discrimination on the basis of disability and familial
status. Finding no evidence that residents of group homes for
children were either more dangerous than they would be if they
lived with families or more dangerous than residents of permitted
group homes, the court noted that defendant was operating under
stereotyped notions about certain types of group home residents.
The court held that the ordinance’s restrictions on dangerous
persons were not impermissibly vague and ambiguous. Counsel notes
that, after the court granted summary judgment, the parties
settled. Defendant agreed to adopt a new ordinance without special
restrictions on the siting, size, staffing, occupancy, or operation
of group homes for children. Instead they will be governed by the
same rules as for single-family homes. The court awarded plaintiffs
$239,441 in fees and $6,179 in costs.
Additional Information
Files
- Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment
- Plaintiffs' memorandum opposing defendant's motion for partial summary judgment
- Memorandum in opposition to plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment
- Plaintiffs' reply in support of their summary judgment motion
- Reply memorandum in support of defendant's motion for partial summary judgment
- Order
- Memorandum of the United States as amicus curiae
- Plaintiffs' supplemental brief in support of their summary judgment motion
- Defendant's supplemental brief regarding facial neutrality and standard of review
- Response of city of Bellevue to motion to file brief as amicus curiae
- Reply of the United States to defendant's response to motion for leave to file brief as amicus curiae
- Order
- Memorandum supporting request for attorney's fees and costs
- Plaintiffs' reply memorandum supporting request for attorney's fees
- Agreed order of settlement
- Order awarding plaintiffs attorney's fees and costs
