Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Smith v. Brown
35 F.3d 1516 (Fed. Cir. 1994) ; Clearinghouse Number: 50632
Description
Board of Veterans Appeals’ Decisions Are Not Subject to Collateral Review for Clear and Unmistakable Error
Abstract
The Federal Circuit has held that final decisions of the Board of
Veterans Appeals (BVA) are not subject to collateral review under
38 C.F.R. § 3.105(a). Appellee veteran had applied to reopen
his twice-denied claim for service connection for his cervical and
spine disabilities and his once-denied claim for a total disability
rating. His application was denied. Veteran appealed, arguing that
BVA had committed clear and unmistakable error in an earlier
decision to deny reopening by failing to appreciate the meaning of
testimony given by a doctor at a regional office hearing, which
veteran contended would establish the necessary service connection.
BVA characterized veteran’s allegation of clear and
unmistakable error as an assertion of obvious error. Since veteran
had made no formal request for reconsideration because of obvious
error, BVA ruled that veteran’s allegations were not properly
before it and rendered no decision thereon. Veteran appealed. The
Court of Veterans’ Appeals determined that BVA had erred in
failing to consider all the relevant evidence on veteran’s
claim to total disability. In so ruling, the court held that BVA is
required under 38 C.F.R. § 3.105(a) to adjudicate contentions
that it has committed clear and unmistakable error in rendering
previous decisions that have become final. The Department of
Veterans Affairs appealed. Reversing, the court of appeals held
that section 3.105 does not apply to BVA decisions. Noting that
under 38 U.S.C. § 7103 Board decisions are final unless the
chairman of the board exercises his discretion to order
reconsideration, the court found that adopting appellee’s
interpretation of section 3.105 would create a procedural overlap
in the adjudicatory structure and would be inconsistent with
congressional intent to make that type of review discretionary.
Additional Information
Files
No files available.
