Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Pottinger v. City of Miami
No. 88-2406-CIV-MORENO (S.D. Fla. Nov. 16, 1998) ; Clearinghouse Number: 48663
Description
Miami Agrees to Compensate Homeless Persons Who Were Arrested for Misdemeanor Harmless Acts, Such as Sleeping in Public
Abstract
The parties settled this class action alleging that defendant City
of Miami violated plaintiff homeless persons’ constitutional
rights. Plaintiffs claimed that defendant had a policy of arresting
homeless persons for harmless acts, such as sleeping, bathing, or
dressing, that they were forced to perform in public because of
their lack of shelter. They also alleged that defendant city
officials seized and destroyed their property in contravention of
law-enforcement procedures. City agreed to adopt a departmental
order reflecting the city’s commitment to respect homeless
persons’ rights and implementing a protocol that law
enforcement officers must follow when encountering homeless
persons. Law enforcement officers would not arrest or detain
homeless persons observed not engaging in any criminal conduct.
Homeless persons observed committing a "life-sustaining
conduct" misdemeanor (acts that are misdemeanor offenses by
virtue of the person being without shelter, i.e., eating, sleeping,
sitting, congregating, or walking in public) would be arrested for
such conduct only if shelter was available and the person refused
to accept it. Miami Police Department would follow its own internal
procedures for taking custody of homeless persons’ personal
property. City agreed to adopt a procedure for monitoring and
accounting for its police officers’ encounters with homeless
persons and to establish an advisory committee to monitor such
police contacts. City agreed to compensate members of plaintiff
class who suffered injuries under city’s former policy and to
pay plaintiffs $900,000 in attorney fees.
