Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Streicher v. Zanni
No. SP 1598-83 (D.C. Super. Ct. July 12, 1996). ; Clearinghouse Number: 42913
Description
Court Orders Psychiatric Hospital to Review Involuntarily Committed Patients’ Status
Abstract
The court has held that the District of Columbia Mental Health
Commission has violated plaintiff patients’ rights to receive
periodic review of their involuntary commitment. Plaintiffs, a
class of persons involuntarily committed to a hospital, alleged
that the review procedures of the District’s civil commitment
statute, known as the Ervin Act, were constitutionally inadequate.
The Ervin Act entitles noncriminal patients to have their
involuntary status reviewed at least every six months,
automatically by hospital staff and individually at the
patient’s request. The court found that 84 percent of a
randomly selected sample of 69 patients had not received the
required reviews. Finding that hospital staff had ignored the Ervin
Act’s requirements on a continual basis, the court ordered
the hospital to provide all involuntarily committed patients a
periodic review by November 1, 1996. It ordered defendant to give,
upon admission, written and oral notice to involuntarily committed
patients and their families of their right to review, as well as
notice, at least seven days in advance, of impending reviews.
Patients, their family, and counsel should be allowed to
participate in the review process; patients should be given a
written copy of the results within a reasonable period of time
thereafter and should be permitted to challenge them. And the
hospital should maintain accurate and comprehensive records of
periodic reviews.
