Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Abbott v. Burke
170 N.J. 537 (2002) ; Clearinghouse Number: 30938
Description
In Decades-Long School Funding Case, New Jersey Appellate Court Finds New State Regulations Constitutional
Abstract
A New Jersey appellate court upheld with slight modification recent
state school reform regulations aimed at remedying disparities
between property-rich and property-poor school districts.
Plaintiffs challenged these regulations, which were adopted
pursuant to earlier court orders in this twenty-year legal battle
to remedy these disparities. In 1981 New Jersey public school
students in districts with low property values challenged the
state’s school financing system as contrary to their state
constitutional right to a thorough and efficient education.
Plaintiffs relied on a 1973 state supreme court decision that held
unconstitutional the state’s school financing system because
heavy reliance on property tax fostered excessive disparities
between districts. When the legislature passed a new school finance
law in response to that decision, plaintiffs claimed that, as
implemented, it did not remedy the problem. In Abbott II
the supreme court agreed with plaintiffs as to several poor urban
districts and ordered that, without relying on local tax, funding
be substantially equalized between these and property-rich
districts, that the legislature provide funding for the special
needs of students in poorer districts, and that school buildings in
poor districts be improved. The court did not require equal
expenditures per student; instead it set a substantive level of
education as a floor. In Abbott III and IV the
court found inadequate school finance legislation passed in
response to each respective prior court decision. In Abbott
V the court ordered the commissioner of education to implement
regulations consistent with the court’s opinion, following a
“whole-school reform” plan. In Abbott VI the
court required some modification of the preschool education
programs and state funding of all necessary building repair and
construction costs in Abbott districts.
Additional Information
Files
- Civil action complaint
- Opinion
- Opinion
- Court syllabus
- Decision
- Court syllabus
- Court syllabus
- Court syllabus
- Certification
- Certification
- Brief in support of motion for leave to appear as amici curiae
- Notice of motion for leave to appear as amici curiae
- Request for oral argument from amici curiae
- Certification
- Certification
- Certification
- Opinion
