Browse cases by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Evidence
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Other
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Torts
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Miller v. Youakim
No. 95-1670 (U.S. June 24, 1996) ; Clearinghouse Number: 15393
Description
Supreme Court Affirms Decision Striking Down Illinois Statute Which Denied AFDC-FC to Children Placed with Relatives
Abstract
The Supreme Court has affirmed a decision which struck down an
Illinois statute which denied eligibility for AFDC-Foster Care to
children who are entitled to basic AFDC benefits but are placed in
the homes of relatives. In administering the program, Illinois
distinguished between related and unrelated foster parents, denying
benefits to children placed with relatives because the state
defined the term "foster family home" as a facility for
children unrelated to the operator. The Court concluded that
Illinois incorrectly interpreted 42 U.S.C. § 608(a), which
provides that to qualify for foster care assistance, the children
must be placed in a "foster family home or child-care
institution." The Court had vacated an earlier ruling in the
case on the basis of an intervening HEW formal interpretation of
the scope of the AFDC-FC program. That interpretation concluded
that the foster care rate of payment applies regardless of whether
or not the foster home is operated by a relative. The district
court then ruled that the Illinois program conflicted with the
Social Security Act and awarded summary judgment to appellees, a
decision unanimously affirmed by the Seventh Circuit. The Court
rejected the contention that Congress enacted the Foster Care
program solely for the benefit of children not otherwise eligible
for categorical assistance. The Court examined the language and
legislative history of 42 U.S.C. §608 and concluded that
Congress intended to provide care for all dependent children who
are removed from their homes pursuant to a judicial determination
of neglect. The Court also cited HEW's interpretation, noting
that it was fully supported by the statute, its legislative
history, and "the common sense observation that all dependent
foster children are similarly in need of the protections and
monetary benefits afforded by the AFDC-FC program."
Additional Information
Files
- Motion for Leave to File Amici Curiae Brief
- Opinion
- Plaintiff's Motion to Adjudicate Defendant McDonald
- Plaintiff's Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law/Memorandum
- Defendant's proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
- Memorandum in opposition to Defendant-Appellant's Motion to Stay Injunction
- Memorandum Option and Order
