Democratic Presidential Candidates Talk About Their Solutions to the Health Care Crisis
Health care has taken a significant position on the national stage.
One indication of this is the health care forum that the Center for
American Progress, in coordination with the Service Employees
International Union, sponsored last month for the field of declared
Democratic presidential candidates.
Forty-eight million Americans have no health insurance. The uninsured
are sicker and die sooner. They have crushing medical debt, which is
the second leading cause of family bankruptcy and a leading cause of
family stress and breakdown. The problem of health coverage concerns
all Americans—those who have insurance, those offered insurance by
employers who turn it down due to the expense, and the uninsured. The
entire electorate must demand that every Democratic and Republican
presidential candidate take a position on how to solve the nation’s
health care crisis.
The most radical option offered at the forum came from Rep. Dennis
Kucinich of Ohio and former Sen. Mike Gravel of Alaska. Both candidates
promoted delivering universal health care through a single-payer health
insurance plan.
(According to Physicians for a National Health Program, a single-payer
national health insurance is “a system in which a single public or
quasi-public agency organizes health financing, but delivery of care
remains largely private.” A single-payer system would have all
Americans covered for all medically necessary services, including
doctor, hospital, long-term care, mental health, dental vision,
prescription drug, and medical supply costs.)
Representative Kucinich said, “A not-for-profit health care system is
not only possible, but H.R. 676 that I introduced … actually
establishes Medicare for all, a single-payer system and it’s a
not-for-profit system.”
Former Senator Gravel echoed Kucinich’s initiative: “We can turn around
and say let’s have a health care program that established equality…
It’s called the universal single-payer—by single-payer I mean all
Americans pay for it regardless of the system you have
now.”
Gravel and Kucinich touted the effectiveness of the federal
government’s managed health care plans—Medicare, Medicaid, and the
Veterans Administration and how these successful programs could be
nationalized, benefiting all Americans.
Former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina spent his three minutes
detailing the specifics of his universal health care plan: “What we
need is a big, bold, dramatic change, not small change… In my plan
there’s shared responsibilities. The employers are required to either
cover their employees or to pay into a fund that will help pay for
coverage for their employees.”
Edwards’s health care proposal establishes a national Medicare-like
plan, which would essentially compete with private-market insurance
companies. His proposal includes a subsidy program to help low-income
and middle-income families pay their monthly health care premiums.
Edwards proposed paying for the plan by rolling back President Bush’s
tax cuts.
Gov. Bill Richardson of New Mexico offered innovative ways to set up a
more fiscally responsible health care program in America over the
long-term—investing in cancer research, healthier school lunches, and
stem cell research. The governor announced that “by the end of my first
term we’re going to have universal health care for every single
American in the United States.”
Sen. Barak Obama of Illinois admitted that his campaign did not have a
vetted health care plan but presented the core features that he would
incorporate: “Number one, we’re going to have to make sure that
everybody is in. Number two, we’ve got to make sure that we apply some
principles… We’ve got to put more money in prevention… I do believe
that employers are going to have to pay or play.”
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York opened up by unabashedly
showing her health care wounds. The former First Lady suggested that
her experience with the 1994 universal health care plan would best
equip her to maneuver around the powerful interest groups in the
Beltway.
On the topic of health care for all, Senator Clinton said, “So we can’t
get universal health care coverage unless we end insurance
discrimination once and for all… No more free riders. No more companies
that don’t insure everybody and shift their costs onto other companies
that do and onto the taxpayer…” Senator Clinton also spoke about the
nation’s need to invest in technologies for record-keeping
purposes.
Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut focused on three principles:
universality, prevention, and “building upon the good things we’ve done
already: forty years of Medicaid and Medicare.” Dodd concentrated
almost exclusively on his experience in the U.S. Senate for the past 27
years; he highlighted his work on the Family and Medical Leave Act and
Head Start.
The Democratic presidential candidates seem to understand that the U.S.
health care system is in desperate need of repair: Americans are sick
and tired of being sick and tired. Americans want a solution because
the cost of doing nothing has been too great.
To learn more about the health care forum, go to the Center for American Progress website.
