Browse Clearinghouse Review articles by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Communications & Marketing
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Fundraising & Development
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- Leadership
- Legal Research
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Technology
- Training
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Oklahoma’s Anti-Sharia and Other Antitransnational Law Proposals: A Backgrounder for Domestic Human Rights Advocates
Many
state legislatures have recently considered limits on state court
judges’ use of transnational law (foreign or international law). Several
such efforts specifically targeted Sharia. Oklahoma voters took the
most extreme action when they approved a constitutional amendment to ban
state courts from even considering transnational law. These
developments threaten judicial independence and may have strategic and
ethical implications for human rights advocates.
Copies of this article are available for individual purchase online for $15 apiece.
Related Articles
- Caroline Bettinger-López, The Inter-American Human Rights System: A Primer (March-April 2009)
- Martha F. Davis, Human Rights in the Trenches: Using International Human Rights Law in “Everyday” Legal Aid Cases (Nov.-Dec. 2007)
