Browse Clearinghouse Review articles by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Communications & Marketing
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Fundraising & Development
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- Leadership
- Legal Research
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Technology
- Training
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Postracialism or Targeted Universalism?
After the election of
the first African-American U.S. president, many ascribe to the notion of
"postracialism" as a kind of positive race blindness and assert that
focusing on race-specific programs or talking about race is divisive. To
the contrary, a false universal approach to public programs, such as
those of the New Deal, Veterans Affairs, Social Security Act, and GI
Bill illustrate, reveals many inequities. To keep this conversation
alive, advocates need to learn about structural racialization and
implicit bias.
Copies of this article are available for purchase online for $15 apiece.
Related Articles
- Maya Wiley and john a. powell, Tearing Down Structural Racism and Rebuilding Communities (May-June 2006)
- Bill Kennedy, Emily Fisher, and Colin Bailey, Framing in Race-Conscious, Antipoverty Advocacy: A Science-Based Guide to Delivering Your Most Persuasive Message (Jan.-Feb. 2010)
