"Public Notice Forums": Choosing Among Alternatives to Confront the Intent Requirement

You must be a Clearinghouse Review subscriber to view this article. Log in or subscribe.

The requirement to prove that discrimination was intentional has long been a difficult barrier to overcome by plaintiffs challenging government policies that have disparate racial impact. A new legal strategy seeks to surmount that barrier by relying on the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in City of Canton v. Harris that intent can be inferred when government officials choose a harmful course of action from among alternatives. Advocates are relying on "public notice forums" to put officials on notice of the impact of existing policies and of proven alternatives that would reduce racial disparities.

Copies of this article are available for purchase online for $15 apiece.

Related Articles

By Edgar S. Cahn, Cynthia Robbins, and Keri A. Nash From 2010 July-August Clearinghouse Review