Browse Clearinghouse Review articles by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Communications & Marketing
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Fundraising & Development
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- Leadership
- Legal Research
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Technology
- Training
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
The Olmstead Decision at Ten: Directions for Future Advocacy
June 2009 marked the tenth anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Olmstead v. L.C. Yet millions of people with disabilities remain institutionalized even though, with new service approaches, people with even the most challenging needs can now be served in integrated community settings. Future Olmstead implementation efforts should incorporate several fundamental principles to give people with disabilities a real chance to live, as much as possible, “like everyone else”—the fundamental goal of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
Copies of this article are available for individual purchase online for $15 apiece.
Related Articles:
- Jennifer Mathis, Where Are We Five Years After Olmstead? (Jan.–Feb. 2005)
- Jennifer Mathis, Community Integration of Individuals with Disabilities: An Update on Olmstead Implementation (Nov.–Dec. 2001)
- Ira Burnim & Jennifer Mathis, After Olmstead v. L.C.: Enforcing the Integration Mandate of the Americans with Disabilities Act (March–April 2000)
