Browse Clearinghouse Review articles by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Communications & Marketing
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Fundraising & Development
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- Leadership
- Legal Research
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Technology
- Training
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
A Road Map for Challenging Voter Restriction Laws After Crawford
In Crawford v. Marion County Election Board a highly fractured U.S. Supreme Court last Term ruled that Indiana’s voter-identification law, commonly known as the “Voter ID Law,” did not violate the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. While this decision disappointed many, particularly with its use of the less stringent “flexible” balancing test, the silver lining is in so framing a voting rights case as to challenge successfully a law that impinges on the right to vote.
Copies of this article are available for individual purchase online for $15 apiece.
Related articles
- The Modern-Day Poll Tax: How Economic Sanctions Block Access to the Polls
- Homeless But Not Voiceless: Protecting the Voting Rights of Homeless Persons
