Browse Clearinghouse Review articles by category
- Attorneys & Legal Services
- Bankruptcy
- Civil Procedure & Administrative Law
- Civil Rights
- Communications & Marketing
- Consumer
- Criminal
- Disability
- Economic Development
- Education
- Elections
- Employment
- Environmental Justice
- Family Law
- Food Programs
- Fundraising & Development
- Government and Governmental Services
- Guardianship & Conservatorship
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Juveniles
- Leadership
- Legal Research
- License (Auto & Others)
- Mental Health
- Migrants
- Native Americans
- Prisons
- Public Utilities & Energy
- Rural Issues
- Senior Citizens
- Social Security & SSI
- Taxation
- Technology
- Training
- Unemployment Compensation & Unemployment Insurance
- Veterans & Military
- Welfare
- Wills & Estates
- Workforce Development
Closing the Courthouse Doors
Not only have recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions created substantial obstacles to civil rights litigation, but, more perniciously, most of the Rehnquist Court's civil rights cases show a profound disrespect for the importance of the availability of the judicial process to injured individuals. The consistent theme that unites these recent decisions is how they close the courthouse doors to those whose rights have been violated. Although there are no easy solutions, there are avenues for reopening the courthouse doors to civil rights litigants.
