<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

    
        <title>Shriver Center: Clearinghouse Review</title>
        <id>http://povertylaw.org/</id>
        <rights>The Sargent Shriver National Center On Poverty Law, All Rights Reserved</rights>
        <generator>Zope 3</generator>
        <updated>2010-08-05T21:43:39Z</updated>
        <link rel="self"
              href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2000/20000115/500198/atom.xml"/>
    

    <entry>
        

            <title>About This Issue</title>
            <updated>2010-08-05T21:43:39Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/about-this-issue</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            

            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/about-this-issue"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Legal Services Attorney Fees Are Obtainable in Pending Cases</title>
            <updated>2010-08-05T21:43:42Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/bobroff</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            

            
                <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Programs receiving federal funding should take immediate advantage of 
the December 2009 law lifting the restriction on the claiming and 
collection of attorney fees. The Legal Services Corporation's February 
2010 interim final rule states that the revocation applies to pending 
cases and work performed prior to the effective date of the law. 
Carefully crafted arguments can support a motion to amend complaints to 
seek attorney fees for work performed before December 2009.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Copies of this article are &lt;a id="lrat" title="available for purchase online for $15 apiece" href="https://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1281/t/1577/shop/shop.jsp?storefront_KEY=817"&gt;available for purchase online for $15 apiece&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Related Articles&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/bobroff"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>"Public Notice Forums": Choosing Among Alternatives to Confront the Intent Requirement</title>
            <updated>2010-08-13T18:10:27Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/cahn</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            

            
                <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;The requirement to prove that discrimination was intentional has long 
been a difficult barrier to overcome by plaintiffs challenging 
government policies that have disparate racial impact. A new legal 
strategy seeks to surmount that barrier by relying on the U.S. Supreme 
Court's ruling in &lt;i&gt;City of Canton v. Harris&lt;/i&gt; that intent can be 
inferred when government officials choose a harmful course of action 
from among alternatives. Advocates are relying on "public notice forums"
 to put officials on notice of the impact of existing policies and of 
proven alternatives that would reduce racial disparities. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Copies of this article are &lt;a id="u48k" title="available for purchase online for $15 apiece" href="https://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1281/t/1577/shop/shop.jsp?storefront_KEY=817"&gt;available for purchase online for $15 apiece&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Related Articles&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Bill Kennedy, Emily Fisher, &amp;amp; Colin Bailey, &lt;a id="lak3" title="Framing in Race-Conscious Anti-Poverty Advocacy:  A Science-Based Guide to Delivering Your Most Persuasive Message" href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/jan-feb/kennedy.pdf"&gt;Framing in Race-Conscious Anti-Poverty Advocacy:  A Science-Based Guide to Delivering Your Most Persuasive Message&lt;/a&gt; (January - February 2010)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Cristóbal Joshua Alex, &lt;a id="t7vf" title="The Rollback of Civil Rights in the Courts and the Potential Impact of the Civil Rights Act of 2008" href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2008/2008-12-01/alex.pdf"&gt;The Rollback of Civil Rights in the Courts and the Potential Impact of the Civil Rights Act of 2008&lt;/a&gt; (November - December 2008)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Eva Jefferson Paterson, Kimberly Thomas Rapp, and Shannon Seibert, &lt;a id="e8kh" title="Forging Ahead Beyond Intent" href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2006/sept-oct-2006/paterson"&gt;Forging Ahead Beyond Intent&lt;/a&gt; (September - October 2006)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;John Pollock, &lt;a id="hwbl" title="Breathing Life into Intent:  Proving Racially Discriminatory Purpose in a Post-Arlington Heights World" href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2006/sept-oct-2006/pollock"&gt;Breathing Life into Intent:  Proving Racially Discriminatory Purpose in a Post-&lt;i&gt;Arlington Heights&lt;/i&gt; World&lt;/a&gt; (September - October 2006) &lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/cahn"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Social Security Rulings--Guiding Hand in SSI Childhood Disability Evaluations</title>
            <updated>2010-08-05T21:43:39Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/callery</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            

            
                <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Through Social Security Rulings in 2009 the Social Security 
Administration brought greater order to scattered and piecemeal policies
 for determining childhood disability in the Supplemental Security 
Income (SSI) program. The rulings focus on the functional equivalence 
analysis, which is the final step in childhood disability determination 
and the point at which the evaluation differs from that for adults. 
Advocates are finding the rulings helpful at the hearing stage, as 
administrative law judges and federal district courts are relying on the
 rulings in finding that children meet the criteria for SSI. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Copies of this article are &lt;a id="jvc-" title="available for purchase online for $15 apiece" href="https://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1281/t/1577/shop/shop.jsp?storefront_KEY=817"&gt;available for purchase online for $15 apiece&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Related Articles&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Thomas Yates, &lt;a id="yc_:" title="New Rules, Same Standard:  The Social Security Administration Adopts New Rules for Evaluating SSI Childhood Disability" href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2001/20010515/500773"&gt;New Rules, Same Standard:  The Social Security Administration Adopts New Rules for Evaluating SSI Childhood Disability&lt;/a&gt; (May - June 2001)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/callery"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Making the Fair Hearing More Fair</title>
            <updated>2010-08-05T21:43:40Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/capistrano</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            

            
                <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Critical to an effective poverty law practice is a thorough 
understanding of procedural due process rights to which clients involved
 in public benefits proceedings are entitled. These rights are rooted in
 the &lt;i&gt;Goldberg v. Kelly&lt;/i&gt; decision and have evolved through 
numerous, subsequent court decisions. Both newer and more experienced 
advocates can benefit from understanding all of the due process rights 
afforded public benefits litigants throughout the fair hearing stages.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Copies of this article are &lt;a id="b5oa" title="available for purchase online for $15 apiece" href="https://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1281/t/1577/shop/shop.jsp?storefront_KEY=817"&gt;available for purchase online for $15 apiece&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Related Articles&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Anne H. Chen, &lt;a id="lh7." title="Increasing Automation in State Computer Systems: Preventing Technological Barriers to Successful Public Benefits Administration" href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2008/2008-july-august-issue/chen"&gt;Increasing Automation in State Computer Systems: Preventing Technological Barriers to Successful Public Benefits Administration&lt;/a&gt; (July-August 2008)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stephanie E. Haffner, &lt;a id="y.8e" title="Introduction to Administrative Law and Practice for the Poverty Law Advocate" href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2006/20060315/haffner"&gt;Introduction to Administrative Law and Practice for the Poverty Law Advocate&lt;/a&gt; (March - April 2006)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Wendy Pollack, &lt;a id="dafg" title="An Introduction to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program" href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2003/20030115/500928"&gt;An Introduction to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program&lt;/a&gt; (January - February 2003)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/capistrano"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Advocacy Note: Federal District Court Rules that California's Proposal to Cut in-Home Supportive Services Violates the Americans with Disabilities Act, Medicaid Act, and Due Process</title>
            <updated>2010-08-05T21:43:42Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/casenote-branch</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            

            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/casenote-branch"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Advocacy Note: Protecting the Person and the Home: Housing Law Responds to the Needs of Survivors of Violence</title>
            <updated>2010-08-05T21:43:42Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/casenote-walz</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            

            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/casenote-walz"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Administrative Hearing Procedures and Practice</title>
            <updated>2010-08-05T21:43:41Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/lai</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            

            
                <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;At some point in their careers most legal advocates working in poverty 
law will be involved in an administrative proceeding on behalf of a 
client. Administrative hearing procedures differ in many ways from other
 types of trial practice, and successful advocacy in these forums 
depends upon thorough preparation. Both newer and experienced advocates 
can benefit from understanding an administrative hearing through all its
 phases.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Copies of this article are &lt;a id="ewtk" title="available for purchase online for $15 apiece" href="https://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1281/t/1577/shop/shop.jsp?storefront_KEY=817"&gt;available for purchase online for $15 apiece&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Related Articles&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Graham G. Martin and David A. Super, &lt;a id="g_gw" title="Judicial Deference to Administrative Agencies and Its Limits" href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2007/2007-march-april/martin"&gt;Judicial Deference to Administrative Agencies and Its Limits&lt;/a&gt; (March-April 2007)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stephanie E. Haffner, &lt;a id="r_rm" title="Introduction to Administrative Law and Practice for the Poverty Law Advocate" href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2006/20060315/haffner"&gt;Introduction to Administrative Law and Practice for the Poverty Law Advocate&lt;/a&gt; (March - April 2006)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thomas Yates, &lt;a id="s:-:" title="Preparing for and Handling Social Security Adult Disability Hearings" href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2004/20040515/500997"&gt;Preparing for and Handling Social Security Adult Disability Hearings&lt;/a&gt; (May - June 2004)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/lai"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Help for Undocumented Victims of Crime</title>
            <updated>2010-08-05T21:43:41Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/martinez</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            

            
                <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;A client who walks through your door may be the victim of domestic 
violence and in the United States without documentation. She may be wary
 of following through in reporting and prosecuting the crime because of 
her status. You may be able to help her get justice and obtain lawful 
status in the United States. Victims of certain crimes who cooperate 
with law enforcement are eligible for "U" nonimmigrant status and after 
three years may apply for permanent residence in the United States. This
 is an extraordinary remedy and one which Legal Services Corporation 
grantees may pursue.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Copies of this article are &lt;a id="r5m4" title="available for purchase online for $15 apiece" href="https://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1281/t/1577/shop/shop.jsp?storefront_KEY=817"&gt;available for purchase online for $15 apiece&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Related Articles&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/martinez"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>The Dearth of Charity Care: Do Nonprofit Hospitals Deserve Their Tax Exemptions?</title>
            <updated>2010-08-05T21:43:40Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/mcwilliams</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            

            
                <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Low-income patients' medical debt has devastating consequences, yet 
the amount of charity care that hospitals offer is minimal. The Illinois
 Supreme Court, in &lt;i&gt;Provena Covenant Medical Center v. Department of Revenue,&lt;/i&gt;
 upheld the denial of a tax exemption to a nonprofit hospital because of
 the minimal charity care that the hospital offered; rather than 
categorizing unpaid bills as charity care, the hospital engaged in 
aggressive collection practices. Challenges to nonprofit hospitals' tax 
exemptions may offer promising advocacy opportunities.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Copies of this article are &lt;a id="xw9c" title="available for purchase online for $15 apiece" href="https://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1281/t/1577/shop/shop.jsp?storefront_KEY=817"&gt;available for purchase online for $15 apiece&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Related Articles&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Chi Chi Wu, &lt;a id="k0q4" title="Medical Debt" href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2005/20051115/chr501108.pdf"&gt;Medical Debt&lt;/a&gt; (November - December 2005)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Alan A. Alop, &lt;a id="ye0." title="Hospital’s Failure to Provide Charity Write-Off to Indigent, Uninsured Patient and Inflating Charges for Her May Constitute “Unfair Practices” Under Illinois Law; Suit Will Proceed" href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2007/2007-may-june/56067.pdf"&gt;Hospital’s
 Failure to Provide Charity Write-Off to Indigent, Uninsured Patient and
 Inflating Charges for Her May Constitute “Unfair Practices” Under 
Illinois Law; Suit Will Proceed&lt;/a&gt; (May - June 2007)&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/mcwilliams"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>News and Notes</title>
            <updated>2010-08-13T21:44:57Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/newsandnotes</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            

            
                <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Readers may be interested to &lt;a href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/web-extras/podcasts/podcasts"&gt;listen to the podcast &lt;/a&gt;of this month's feature, Perspectives on Health Care Reform.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/newsandnotes"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>A Call to Public Service</title>
            <updated>2010-08-05T21:43:41Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/rosenberg</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            

            
                <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Nothing can be more satisfying and rewarding than to spend one's 
life in public service to others who need it. The Holocaust and life in 
the segregated United States remain bitter reminders of evils that were 
once tolerated but that should never be repeated; they inspire the call 
to public service. Being a trial lawyer for the Civil Rights Division of
 the U.S. Department of Justice from 1962 to 1970 when courts were 
abolishing state-imposed segregation in society was excellent 
preparation for work as a legal services lawyer at the Appalachian 
Research and Defense Fund in Kentucky.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Copies of this article are &lt;a id="wh3v" title="available for purchase online for $15 apiece" href="https://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1281/t/1577/shop/shop.jsp?storefront_KEY=817"&gt;available for purchase online for $15 apiece&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Related Articles&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/rosenberg"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Poverty's Place Revisited: Mapping for Justice and Democratizing Data to Combat Poverty</title>
            <updated>2010-08-05T21:43:42Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/roy</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            

            
                <summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Mapping and GIS (geographic information systems) have proven to be 
important analytical and communications tools to understand how poverty 
and geography intersect and to identify barriers impeding community 
health and stability. This can only lead to better-informed advocacy for
 solutions to problems of poverty and location. Case studies show 
mapping technology's application in fighting poverty. The latest 
movement in the field is to bring mapping to the masses by closing the 
cost and technology gap, thereby empowering community advocates.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Copies of this article are &lt;a id="iwph" title="available for purchase online for $15 apiece" href="https://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/1281/t/1577/shop/shop.jsp?storefront_KEY=817"&gt;available for purchase online for $15 apiece&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Related Articles&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bob Burtman, &lt;a id="v467" title="The Revolution Will Be Mapped" href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-may-june/burtman"&gt;The Revolution Will Be Mapped&lt;/a&gt; (May-June 2010)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;p&gt;Jason Reece and Eric Schultheis, &lt;a id="ajk9" title="Poverty's Place: The Use of Geographic Information Systems in Poverty Advocacy" href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2009/2009-jan-feb/reece"&gt;Poverty's Place: The Use of Geographic Information Systems in Poverty Advocacy&lt;/a&gt;(Jan.-Feb. 2009)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/clearinghouse-review/issues/2010/2010-july-august/roy"/>
        
    </entry>

</feed>

