<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

    
        <title>Shriver Center: Shriver News</title>
        <id>http://povertylaw.org/</id>
        <rights>The Sargent Shriver National Center On Poverty Law, All Rights Reserved</rights>
        <generator>Zope 3</generator>
        <updated>2008-12-04T21:03:07Z</updated>
        <link rel="self"
              href="http://www.povertylaw.org/atom.xml"/>
    

    <entry>
        

            <title>New Federal Extension of Unemployment Compensation Is Signed into Law</title>
            <updated>2008-12-04T21:03:07Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/woman-view/2008-12-04</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;President Bush signed, on November 11, the Unemployment Compensation Act of 2008 (H.R. 6867), which increases the weeks of benefits available to workers who run out of their state unemployment insurance benefits. The new program expands on the 13 weeks of benefits previously provided by the Emergency Unemployment Compensation (EUC) program that began in July. The new law starts to provide benefits for weeks of unemployment that began as of Sunday, November 23. However, there may be delays by states in processing the new EUC benefits. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Eligibility for Additional Weeks of EUC&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Under the original EUC program, workers who ran out of their regular state unemployment benefits (26 weeks in Illinois) and were still looking for work could collect up to 13 weeks of federal jobless benefits (or half of their state benefits, whichever is less). Under the new law, workers in all states are now entitled to collect up to 20 weeks of EUC benefits (or 80 percent of their state benefits, whichever is less), 7 weeks more than provided under the original EUC program. Workers in states with high unemployment are entitled to an additional 13 weeks of EUC (or half their state benefits, whichever is less). In total, workers in high-unemployment states are thus entitled to 33 weeks of EUC. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The law defines high unemployment as any state with an unemployment rate of 6 percent or higher. However, the 6 percent figure is an average of the rate over the latest three-month period; it is not enough that the rate is above 6 percent in any given month. As of November 23, Illinois is among 20 states (and the District of Columbia) qualifying as high-unemployment states. Thus most Illinois workers who already exhausted their 13 weeks of EUC and are still unemployed and still looking for work should receive an additional 20 weeks of EUC. However, since the high-unemployment-rate designation will change as the state unemployment rate goes up and down over the next year, the letters of eligibility sent out by the Illinois Department of Employment Security (IDES) and its website will tell workers that they are entitled to 7 additional weeks, not 20. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;Applying for Benefits in Illinois&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;IDES has begun to send out letters to workers who have exhausted the 13 weeks of EUC, for weeks beginning on or after November 23. The letters explain when workers need to certify to establish their eligibility. December 8 is the earliest possible certification day for those workers. Those who ran out of their original EUC benefits are not allowed to collect the additional weeks of EUC before the new law took effect. However, as long as they are still unemployed and still looking for work, they may collect their full weeks of additional EUC going forward, starting November 23. Workers who are currently collecting EUC benefits under the original 13-week program are also eligible for the extra benefits under the Unemployment Compensation Act. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Payments will be made by debit card, unless the direct-deposit option is selected. For most cases, when regular state benefits run out, an extended benefits claim will be automatically established. Once this claim is established, the worker will receive a “findings” letter indicating eligibility for the extension. In some cases workers will receive a notice to report to a local office to determine entitlement to the EUC benefits. IDES wants people to wait until they receive this letter before they report to their local office. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The EUC program ends on March 28, 2009. No one who runs out of regular state unemployment benefits after March 2009 will qualify for the program. However, anyone who runs out of state unemployment benefits before that date will qualify for their full 20 or 33 weeks of EUC benefits. All benefits under the program run out on August 27, 2009. Because the unemployment situation is worsening, Congress and the President are likely to extend the benefits beyond the March 2009 deadline. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For more information on Emergency Unemployment Compensation in Illinois, please go to &lt;a href="http://www.ides.state.il.us/"&gt;http://www.ides.state.il.us/&lt;/a&gt;. Or contact &lt;a href="mailto:wendypollack@povertylaw.org"&gt;Wendy Pollack&lt;/a&gt; , director, Women’s Law and Policy Project, Shriver Center, at 312.263.3830 ext. 238.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div align="right"&gt;Volume 12, Issue 6&lt;br /&gt;December 4, 2008&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a title="New Federal Extension of Unemployment Compensation Is Signed into Law" href="http://www.povertylaw.org//news-and-events/woman-view/2008-12-04.pdf"&gt;To read this issue in PDF format, click here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;p&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
            

            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/woman-view/2008-12-04"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>California Unveils Portable Retirement Accounts</title>
            <updated>2008-06-13T17:52:09Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/june-2008/california-unveils-portable-retirement-accounts</id>
            <author>
                <name>kristenscaletta</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Visit &lt;a href="http://blog.povertylaw.org/"&gt;Step Forward&lt;/a&gt; to view this post.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
            

            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/june-2008/california-unveils-portable-retirement-accounts"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Plan for Rain or Retirement with Tax Refunds and Stimulus Payments</title>
            <updated>2008-06-13T17:51:00Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/june-2008/plan-for-rain-or-retirement-with-tax-refunds-and-stimulus-payments</id>
            <author>
                <name>kristenscaletta</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Visit &lt;a href="http://blog.povertylaw.org/"&gt;Step Forward&lt;/a&gt; to view this post.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
            

            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/june-2008/plan-for-rain-or-retirement-with-tax-refunds-and-stimulus-payments"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Congress Falls Short in Addressing Foreclosure Crisis</title>
            <updated>2008-06-13T17:50:03Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/june-2008/congress-falls-short-in-addressing-foreclosure-crisis</id>
            <author>
                <name>kristenscaletta</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Visit &lt;a href="http://blog.povertylaw.org/"&gt;Step Forward&lt;/a&gt; to view this post.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
            

            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/june-2008/congress-falls-short-in-addressing-foreclosure-crisis"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Bush Administration Attacks Workers’ Rights </title>
            <updated>2008-06-13T17:49:21Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/june-2008/bush-administration-attacks-workers2019-rights</id>
            <author>
                <name>kristenscaletta</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;strong&gt;Visit &lt;a href="http://blog.povertylaw.org/"&gt;Step Forward&lt;/a&gt; to view this post.&lt;/strong&gt;</content>
            

            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/june-2008/bush-administration-attacks-workers2019-rights"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Support and Involve Emerging Young Leaders Seeking to End Poverty</title>
            <updated>2008-06-13T17:47:40Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/june-2008/support-and-involve-emerging-young-leaders-seeking-to-end-poverty</id>
            <author>
                <name>kristenscaletta</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Visit &lt;a href="http://blog.povertylaw.org/"&gt;Step Forward&lt;/a&gt; to view this post.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
            

            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/june-2008/support-and-involve-emerging-young-leaders-seeking-to-end-poverty"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Quit Stalling and Get to Work</title>
            <updated>2008-06-13T17:46:38Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/june-2008/quit-stalling-and-get-to-work</id>
            <author>
                <name>kristenscaletta</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Visit &lt;a href="http://blog.povertylaw.org"&gt;Step Forward&lt;/a&gt; to view this post.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
            

            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/june-2008/quit-stalling-and-get-to-work"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Children Are the Real Victims of the CMS August Directive</title>
            <updated>2008-03-18T19:10:25Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/march-2008/Children%20Are%20the%20Real%20Victims%20of%20the%20CMS%20August%20Directive.html</id>
            <author>
                <name>kristenscaletta</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p class="MsoBodyTextIndent"&gt;As Congress was finalizing
bipartisan legislation to reauthorize the State Children’s Health Insurance
Program (SCHIP), the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS)
circulated, on August 17, 2007, a new federal directive in the form of a letter
to program directors. The directive dramatically alters rules that had governed
SCHIP for the past ten years, limits states’ ability to design and finance
their own programs, and gives them exactly one year to amend their individual
SCHIP programs or risk corrective action by the federal government. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;CMS imposed a uniform, federal gross income cap of 250
percent of the federal poverty level or $42,925 for a family of four. CMS does
not have legal authority to set income caps on SCHIP, so CMS accomplished a de
facto cap by limiting states’ flexibility to cover children above 250 percent
of the federal poverty level, allowing the higher coverage only when states
prove that they meet new federal guidelines. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The directive demands that, before raising income
eligibility to higher levels, states must show that they have enrolled at least
95 percent of all uninsured children already eligible for SCHIP or
Medicaid—that is, children with incomes below 200 percent of the federal
poverty level. Based on estimates by the Urban Institute of the Census Bureau’s
Current Population Survey, state Medicaid and SCHIP participation rates among
low-income children range from a low of 51 percent in Nevada to a high of 89
percent in Vermont. Overall, enrollment rates vary widely among states and are
difficult to measure. What data CMS will accept to show participation numbers
among the already eligible but uninsured is still not clear. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Once the participation rate
requirement is met, states are allowed to expand their programs above 250
percent of the federal poverty level only if they can show that they have
reasonable procedures to prevent “crowd-out,” a process where parents move
children from private coverage to the publicly funded SCHIP program. States
must prove that private employer-based coverage for lower-income children has
not declined by more than 2 percent over the past five years. Employer coverage
has been on the decline for many years. According to a survey conducted in
October 2007 by the Employee Benefit Research Institute, employer-sponsored
coverage between 2000 and 2005 dropped almost 9 percent for children under 18.
This is a trend that states have little control over, and once again CMS has not
issued clear guidelines for “reasonable procedures” that states may use to
measure such trends. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The CMS directive, effective
August 2008, has already had a significantly negative impact on children’s
coverage. The directive is not only slowing down the coverage of
uninsured children but also leaving more children uninsured as some states pull
back on SCHIP eligibility or scrap planned expansions. Congress must repudiate
the CMS directive as inconsistent with CMS authority and with good policy. The
focus should be on insuring all children, a goal that is within sight if CMS
gets out of the way. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;To learn more, contact Melissa Cubria at &lt;a href="mailto:melissacubria@povertylaw.org"&gt;melissacubria@povertylaw.org&lt;/a&gt; or
312.263.3830 ext. 241.&lt;/p&gt;

</content>
            

            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/march-2008/Children%20Are%20the%20Real%20Victims%20of%20the%20CMS%20August%20Directive.html"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Re: Record-High Ratio of Americans in Prison - Washington Post </title>
            <updated>2008-03-18T19:10:01Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/march-2008/Re-%20Record-High%20Ratio%20of%20Americans%20in%20Prison%20-%20Washington%20Post.html</id>
            <author>
                <name>kristenscaletta</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The United States leads the world, but we are not boasting.
We are the front-runner in both the number and percentage of residents in
incarceration, according to the &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/28/AR2008022801818.html"&gt;Washington
Post (Feb. 29, 2008)&lt;/a&gt;. Although altering decades of shortsighted policies
will take time, public officials are finally beginning to question their “lock
’em up” mentality and find less costly ways to deal with people charged with
crimes. Any city, county, or state can take the following steps almost
immediately to reduce the growing swell of incarcerated people without
endangering public safety:&lt;/p&gt;



&lt;p&gt;   1. Provide drug treatment upon request to individuals with addictions
and not wait for the behavior to place them in the criminal justice system.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2. Screen people charged with crimes for mental health
problems and divert those in need of treatment to community treatment programs.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;3. Make community supervision and supportive services such
as transitional jobs, education, and counseling available to those charged with
less serious, nonviolent crimes.&lt;/p&gt;





&lt;p&gt;4. Classify possession of controlled substances in small
amounts as a civil rather than criminal matter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By adopting these alternative policies to imprisonment, we
can move closer to being smart on crime—not soft, not tough, but smart. For
more information, contact Margaret Stapleton at &lt;a href="mailto:mstapleton@povertylaw.org"&gt;mstapleton@povertylaw.org&lt;/a&gt; or 312.368.3327.&lt;/p&gt;

</content>
            

            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/march-2008/Re-%20Record-High%20Ratio%20of%20Americans%20in%20Prison%20-%20Washington%20Post.html"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>2007 Poverty Scorecard: Rating Members of Congress</title>
            <updated>2008-03-18T19:09:38Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/march-2008/2007%20Poverty%20Scorecard-%20Rating%20Members%20of%20Congress.html</id>
            <author>
                <name>kristenscaletta</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thirty-seven million Americans live in the state of poverty,
but who cares and what are we going to do about it? As a country, we were
forced to confront our progress when the Gulf hurricanes revealed places of
deep poverty. Like the task of building levees and responding to an immense
national catastrophe, the job of taking on the complex structural causes of
poverty is well beyond what compassionate individuals can do. To address the
root causes of poverty, Congress and the President must adopt the right
priorities, enact needed laws, and adequately fund essential programs. This
week the Shriver Center released its 2007 Poverty Scorecard to hold leaders
accountable to that very task.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The 2007 Poverty Scorecard: Rating Members of Congress
assigns letter grades to each member of the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives
according to his or her voting records on poverty-related issues that came to a
vote in 2007—legislation on affordable housing, health care, education, labor,
tax policy, and immigrants’ rights. With the help of a national advisory board
and other antipoverty experts, the Shriver Center identified and analyzed
fourteen Senate votes and fifteen House votes.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;“This Scorecard is important because it looks at a whole
range of critical issues, all of which have to be addressed by the country in
order to deal with millions of Americans, more than the population of
California, who live in poverty every single day,” said John Edwards, the
former senator, Democrat of North Carolina, during the teleconference release
of the Scorecard. “We can get the congressional leadership that we need, but
it’s crucial that voters be educated, that they know who’s doing the right
thing and who’s not.”&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Edwards noted that many of the bills—such as increasing the
minimum wage and making it easier for workers to unionize—that failed in
Congress last year would have easily helped pull Americans out of poverty.
These policy changes reflect the view that if you are working full-time, you
should not be struggling to pay the bills, Edwards said.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;“People who are working ought to be able to provide for
their family,” he said. “People who are working full-time should not be in
poverty.”&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The goal of the Shriver Center’s Poverty Scorecard is not
just to identify poverty-fighting initiatives that Congress acted upon in 2007
and grade each member on how they voted. The Shriver Center also hopes that the
evaluation will shine a light on how Congress is doing, that it will elevate
the issue of poverty on the national agenda, and that members of Congress will
be moved to pay greater attention and perform better in the fight against
poverty.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt; &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For further information, contact Joanna VanderWoude at &lt;a href="mailto:jvanderwoude@povertylaw.org"&gt;jvanderwoude@povertylaw.org&lt;/a&gt; or
312.263.3830 ext. 253.&lt;/p&gt;

</content>
            

            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/news-and-events/poverty-action-report/march-2008/2007%20Poverty%20Scorecard-%20Rating%20Members%20of%20Congress.html"/>
        
    </entry>

</feed>

