<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

    
        <title>Shriver Center: FamilyCare Articles</title>
        <id>http://povertylaw.org/</id>
        <rights>The Sargent Shriver National Center On Poverty Law, All Rights Reserved</rights>
        <generator>Zope 3</generator>
        <updated>2007-08-27T18:58:47Z</updated>
        <link rel="self"
              href="http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/atom.xml"/>
    

    <entry>
        

            <title>Illinois Formally Applies for Family Care Waiver</title>
            <updated>2007-08-27T18:58:47Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/mar-2002-iwn</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The Ryan administration formally launched its effort to begin the
FamilyCare health insurance program when it submitted a FamilyCare
waiver last month to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or
CMS, an agency of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CMS and Illinois will discuss the waiver and negotiate any issues,
and Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy G. Thompson will rule on
it in May. Meanwhile, Gov. George Ryan requested authority from the
General Assembly to spend the federal funds that will come if the
waiver is approved to start FamilyCare during the coming year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The waiver plan.&lt;/strong&gt; The Illinois plan for the
FamilyCare program would provide health insurance choices to over
200,000 parents or guardians of children Illinois already insures under
its KidCare and Medicaid programs. Under the plan, the parents or
guardians may choose either to be covered by state-administered
Medicaid or Medicaid look-alike insurance or to receive a cash subsidy
to help them purchase private insurance or participate in family
coverage under an employer’s plan. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FamilyCare would be offered to families with income up to 185
percent of the federal poverty level (just under $34,000 for a family
of four). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The waiver asks for federal funding for 65 percent of the cost of
the program. Also, the waiver asks that part of the 35 percent Illinois
share of the cost be satisfied by current Illinois spending on health
insurance programs that currently do not receive any federal matching
funds (for example, the Illinois Comprehensive Health Insurance
Program). If approved, this would allow Illinois to implement
FamilyCare partially within the next year without any increase in state
spending. In the future Illinois would need to appropriate new state
funds to complete its 35 percent share of the full program.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Proposed state budget.&lt;/strong&gt; If Secretary Thompson
approves the Illinois waiver, federal funds will begin flowing to
Illinois as soon as FamilyCare starts. Because the General Assembly has
to appropriate, under Illinois law, any money to be spent on programs,
even fully federal money, Governor Ryan included an appropriation of
$40 million for the start of FamilyCare in his proposed budget for the
2003 Illinois fiscal year. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This appropriation assumes a January 1, 2003, start-up date for
FamilyCare to allow the state the lead time needed to prepare to
administer the new program. It would not be spent if the waiver is not
approved. It would fund an initial phase of FamilyCare to cover the
lowest income group and reach 80,000 families.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Full implementation.&lt;/strong&gt; The full expansion of
FamilyCare up to 185 percent of the poverty level to reach 200,000
people would require new state spending in future state budgets. The
new state spending would still be only about a quarter of the total
cost of the program. Though not mandated under current law, this new
spending requires the commitment of a new governor and General Assembly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information, contact &lt;a href="mailto:johnbouman@povertylaw.org" target="_self"&gt;John Bouman&lt;/a&gt;, National Center on Poverty Law, 312.263.3830 ext. 250. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p align="right"&gt;Illinois Welfare News&lt;br /&gt;March 2002&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
            

            
                <summary type="html">The following article appeared in the March 2002 issue of Illinois Welfare News.</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/mar-2002-iwn"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>FamilyCare Must Start in January 2003</title>
            <updated>2007-08-27T18:58:47Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/may-2002-iwn</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The Ryan administration on February 15 filed with the federal
government a waiver that would allow Illinois to begin FamilyCare, the
health insurance program for the uninsured parents of children whom
KidCare or Medicaid covers. Gov. George Ryan also included in his
budget proposal an appropriation authorizing the Department of Public
Aid to use the federal funds that the waiver would generate to start
FamilyCare on January 1, 2003. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The General Assembly must keep this appropriation in the final
budget. The FamilyCare appropriation has no impact at all on the state
budget crisis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Illinois waiver sets up a program of health insurance choices.
All beneficiaries at any income level would have a choice between
state-administered Medicaid (or Medicaid look-alike) or a cash subsidy
to help pay premiums for employer-based or private coverage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Illinois waiver asks for federal funding for 65 percent of the
cost of the program. The waiver also asks that part of the 35 percent
Illinois share of the cost be satisfied by up to $45 million of current
Illinois spending on health insurance programs that do not receive any
federal matching funds. If approved, this would allow Illinois to
receive around $80 million in federal funding with no new state
spending. Therefore:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;The first $80 million for FamilyCare would be fully federally
funded. These are the funds in Governor Ryan’s announced budget
(because he proposes implementation halfway through the year, the
appropriation is $40 million). There would be no new state general
revenue fund (or other) spending. These federal funds may not be used
for anything else. If we do not use them for FamilyCare, we will not
receive them at all. This proposed first step for FamilyCare would set
eligibility at approximately 65 percent of the federal poverty level
and reach 80,000 families beginning January 1, 2003. &lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The eventual full implementation of FamilyCare will be 75-80
percent federally funded. When FamilyCare is fully implemented to cover
families up to 185 percent of the poverty level (up to approximately
230,000 families), the full cost of the program will be in excess of
$300 million. New state spending, however, will be $60-70 million
(depending on enrollment). This means that new state spending will be
only 20-25 percent of the total program cost. This is an excellent
investment for Illinois.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy
Thompson will rule on Illinois’s waiver application by the middle of
May 2002. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Illinois will retain authority to deal with FamilyCare appropriately
given state finances. The state will not be committed to spend money in
years after the 2003 fiscal year beyond its means and choices. Because
FamilyCare is not designed as an entitlement, the state will have the
full array of administrative and legislative means to keep spending
within authorized levels. &lt;br /&gt;Eleven reasons why FamilyCare should move ahead in the 2003 fiscal year if the waiver is granted are:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;The start-up for 80,000 families on January 1, 2003, is fully federally funded.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;This is a positive accomplishment for this General Assembly for
low-income working families already under pressure from the economy and
the difficult state budget.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Illinois risks losing the federal funds that would pay for
FamilyCare if it does not use them now—access to the funds (the
Illinois KidCare allotment) is time limited.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;This is a major work-force investment being made all across the
country. Nineteen other states already have parent coverage. Michigan
and New Mexico also have waivers pending.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Businesses support FamilyCare. Health insurance improves the health, productivity, and employability of workers.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;FamilyCare’s premium subsidy program will keep healthier employees
in employer-supported health plans; this controls premium increases.
Otherwise, due to rising costs, healthier employees are opting not to
be insured; this leaves employers with sicker and smaller insured
groups, leading to higher premium increases.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Health insurance allows people to access preventive and maintenance health care; this saves the expense of later acute care.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Enrolling parents helps enroll more children. Covering parents increases well-child use of medical services.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;FamilyCare will decrease uncompensated care at hospitals.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;FamilyCare will decrease family financial stress and personal bankruptcies.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;FamilyCare will not be a center of medical inflation. It costs only
$109 per month per member. There will be no long-term care. The average
prescription drug use will be three prescriptions a year.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information, contact &lt;a href="mailto:johnbouman@povertylaw.org"&gt;John Bouman&lt;/a&gt;, National Center on Poverty Law, 312.263.3830 ext. 250. &lt;/p&gt;</content>
            

            
                <summary type="html">The following article appeared in the May 2002 issue of Illinois Welfare News.</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/may-2002-iwn"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Governor's FamilyCare Proposal Is Included in the Budget: Federal Waiver Is Last Step to Start Program</title>
            <updated>2007-08-27T18:58:47Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/june-2002-iwn</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The final state budget sent to Gov. George Ryan includes an
appropriation of $40 million to start the FamilyCare program on January
1, 2003. The appropriation authorizes the spending of the federal funds
that would be generated when the federal government grants the Illinois
FamilyCare waiver. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That request is still pending in Washington, and negotiations are
ongoing over finalizing the waiver. State officials’ best estimate as
to when it will be granted is mid- to late June, and those officials
are very optimistic that the waiver will indeed be granted when the
details are settled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Governor Ryan filed the federal waiver request on February 15. A
week later he announced his 2003 fiscal year budget proposal, which
included the $40 million appropriation for FamilyCare. Throughout the
very difficult spring legislative session, amid ever worsening
financial news for the state, FamilyCare stayed in the administration’s
plans. At least one legislative “doomsday” budget would have cut the
FamilyCare appropriation out of the budget, not because this would save
any state money (the appropriation is entirely federal funds), but
because of a “no new programs” attitude and fears (unfounded) about
possible uncontrollable spending obligations in later years (Illinois
retains full control over this under the waiver).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nevertheless, Governor Ryan reasserted the FamilyCare appropriation
in his extraordinary Memorial Day speech announcing his second
comprehensive budget proposal for the 2003 fiscal year. The legislative
leaders had their fears or misconceptions about FamilyCare
satisfactorily answered in the ensuing days, and FamilyCare stayed in
all further versions of the budget.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The negotiations on the federal waiver are ongoing. Illinois will
receive less matching money than originally expected. Illinois now can
expect about $40 million in federal money matching existing state
expenditures (instead of $80 million). &lt;/p&gt;
For more information, contact John Bouman, National Center on Poverty Law, 312.263.3830 ext. 250, &lt;a href="mailto:johnbouman@povertylaw.org"&gt;johnbouman@povertylaw.org&lt;/a&gt;. </content>
            

            
                <summary type="html">The following article appeared in the June 2002 issue of Illinois Welfare News.</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/june-2002-iwn"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Federal Funding Approved, FamilyCare Begins This Month</title>
            <updated>2007-08-27T18:58:47Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/oct-2002-iwn</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;FamilyCare, a new
health care program for low-income adults with children, is set to
begin enrolling and covering the first beneficiaries this month. U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson and
Gov. George Ryan announced the program’s launch last month.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FamilyCare offers health insurance to low-income working parents (or
other relatives who are the chidren’s caretakers) whose children the
state already covers under the KidCare or Medicaid programs. At least
28,000 adults will be eligible starting this month—paid for entirely
with federal funds. Ultimately as many as 300,000 Illinois parents may
be eligible for FamilyCare. Beyond the first 28,000 people, the federal
government has agreed to pay for 65 percent of the cost. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thus the full rollout to potentially 300,000 people must wait until
Illinois puts up its 35 percent share (approximately $80 million,
depending on enrollment). This is an excellent leverage of federal
funds for the popular and important program, and it immediately becomes
a high priority for the new governor and the General Assembly to be
elected next month.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Working with the National Center on Poverty Law and other community
groups and advocates, the Ryan administration espoused FamilyCare late
in the 2001 General Assembly session. The Department of Public Aid
filed the federal “waiver” proposal seeking approval of federal funds
in February 2002. Governor Ryan included the program in his proposed
budget, which the General Assembly approved during the 2002 spring
session. The General Assembly’s approval depended upon the winning of
the federal waiver that gives Illinois access to substantial federal
funds for FamilyCare.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Federal funding. &lt;/strong&gt;The waiver provides federal
funding to expand health insurance eligibility for parents from 40
percent of the federal poverty level (the current level under Medicaid,
or $7,060 for a family of four) to 185 percent of the federal poverty
level (currently $32,650 for a family of four). The waiver provides
that Illinois (without having to spend any new state funds) will
immediately receive sufficient federal funds to cover the 28,000 people
in the program’s first phase, with enrollment and coverage beginning
this month. This expands the eligibility level to 49 percent of the
federal poverty level ($8,869 for a family of four). Further expansion
will require new state appropriations to cover the 35 percent state
share.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John Bouman, deputy director of the National Center on Poverty Law,
said, “FamilyCare offers a major breakthrough on health services for
people working in low-paying jobs, who otherwise cannot afford the
employer’s health insurance or whose employers do not offer health
insurance.” Health insurance will improve employees’ productivity on
the job. Studies also show that covering parents improves both the
enrollment of children in health insurance and the frequency and
quality of their health care.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Program rules.&lt;/strong&gt; Under FamilyCare an eligible family
must contain children eligible for Medicaid or KidCare, and the
children must enroll. For families with income above 133 percent of the
federal poverty level ($24,073 for a family of four), the program
offers the family a choice of either state-administered insurance
(Medicaid) or a cash subsidy to help pay premiums for employer’s or
private insurance. The waiver allows Illinois to offer this choice to
people lower on the income scale in the future. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For families who are above 133 percent of the federal poverty level
and opt for the state’s insurance (Medicaid look-alike), there will be
small copayments for FamilyCare as under KidCare. For families who are
above 150 percent of the federal poverty level ($27,150 for a family of
four) and opt for the state’s insurance, there also will be monthly
premiums of $15 for one person, $25 for two, $30 for three, $35 for
four, and $40 for five or more.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;October enrollment rules.&lt;/strong&gt; The Department of Public
Aid plans to implement the initial rollout this month under a temporary
set of procedures. Those eligible include families with income at or
under 49 percent of the federal poverty level (see table 1).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eligible families whose children are already covered by KidCare or
Medicaid may call the Illinois Department of Human Services, or IDHS,
office that serves their area and request to be added to the existing
KidCare or Medicaid case that already includes the child or children.
The IDHS office will request current income information from the
family, unless the family has recently submitted this information in
connection with a health insurance or food stamp redetermination. This
process is supposed to be available entirely by phone and mail,
although local IDHS office practices may vary, and families may wish to
appear in person to ensure that the process is completed. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eligible families whose children are not already enrolled in KidCare
or Medicaid will be required for the time being to appear in person at
the IDHS office to process an application for the children and parents
or caretakers. Alternatively this type of family may apply for KidCare
for just the children under any of the many means of applying for
KidCare (including mail-in applications and sites other than IDHS). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After the children are enrolled, the adult can phone the IDHS office
to be added to the case (probably at least a month later). The
Department of Public Aid intends to structure the application process
for FamilyCare to be the same as the current process for applications
for KidCare (a variety of ways to apply with a visit to the IDHS office
being just one of several options). However, part of the tradeoff for
the prompt implementation this month is that it will temporarily be
necessary for new families to apply in person at the IDHS office if
they want immediate coverage of the adults.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Information is available toll-free on the Department of Public Aid’s
KidCare hotline, 866.468.7543 (866.4.OUR.KIDS) (TTY: 877.204.1012).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information, contact &lt;a href="mailto:johnbouman@povertylaw.org"&gt;John Bouman&lt;/a&gt;, National Center on Poverty Law, 312.263.3830 ext. 250.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;

&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td colspan="3"&gt;
&lt;div align="center"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Table 1.--Income of Eligible Families&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="center"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Family Size&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="center"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Monthly Income&lt;br /&gt;(49% federal poverty level)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="center"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Annual Income&lt;br /&gt;(49% federal poverty level&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="center"&gt;1&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="right"&gt;$362&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="right"&gt;$4,341&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="center"&gt;2&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="right"&gt;488&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="right"&gt;5,851&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="center"&gt;3&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="right"&gt;613&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="right"&gt;7,360&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="center"&gt;4&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="right"&gt;739&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="right"&gt;8,869&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="center"&gt;5&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="right"&gt;865&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="right"&gt;10,378&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content>
            

            
                <summary type="html">This article appeared in the October 2002 issue of Illinois Welfare News.</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/oct-2002-iwn"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Facts About FamilyCare</title>
            <updated>2007-08-27T18:58:47Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/dec-2002-iwn</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Early enrollment numbers.&lt;/strong&gt; The Illinois Department
of Public Aid switched 9,500 families from spend-down status to
FamilyCare on November 1. These families will receive health coverage
at no cost to them (other than the general copays imposed on all
Medicaid beneficiaries last year). As of late November the department
had enrolled 1,000 additional families. This makes a total of 10,500
newly insured people due to FamilyCare. That’s great. It also means
that there are about 18,000 more eligible families out there still to
sign up. Keep them coming!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Noncitizens: Are they eligible?&lt;/strong&gt; Undocumented people
are not eligible for either KidCare or FamilyCare. Federal KidCare and
Medicaid rules (enacted as part of the welfare reform law in 1996)
require that documented (“legal”) immigrants go through a five-year
waiting period before being eligible for federally funded coverage.
Illinois (using state funds) covers legal immigrant children in KidCare
with no waiting period. In FamilyCare, however, the adults will have to
go through the five-year waiting period. The federal law requiring the
waiting period for legal immigrants will be considered in Congress
early next year when Congress addresses reauthorization of the welfare
reform law. Proposals to repeal it will be in play, so watch for
advocacy alerts from your sources of information on welfare reform.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please note, however, that pregnant noncitizens—including the
undocumented—are eligible for KidCare under the “Moms and Babies”
category. This provision preexisted FamilyCare and will continue. &lt;/p&gt;
In summary, documented children are eligible for KidCare;
undocumented children are ineligible for KidCare; and undocumented
(nonpregnant) adults are ineligible for FamilyCare. Documented adults
will not be eligible for FamilyCare until they have been in the United
States for five years.—&lt;em&gt;John Bouman&lt;/em&gt;</content>
            

            
                <summary type="html">This article appeared in the December 2002 issue of Illinois Welfare News.</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/dec-2002-iwn"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Governor Urged to Fund FamilyCare Fully in '04 Budget</title>
            <updated>2007-08-27T18:58:47Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/mar-2003-iwn</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Thousands of people are writing to Gov. Rod Blagojevich to urge him
to  fund the state’s share of the FamilyCare program fully in his
budget proposal. The governor, who expressed support of FamilyCare in
his recent “State of the State” address, is to announce his budget plan
on April 9.  Full funding for FamilyCare would allow the program to
cover around 300,000 people, mostly working parents.  The state’s 35
percent share of  the cost of full implementation would mean $33
million in next year’s budget.  The federal government has agreed to
cover the majority of the cost (65 percent).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background.&lt;/strong&gt; FamilyCare provides health insurance
for parents and caretakers of minor children who are currently covered
by KidCare or Medicaid.  Illinois received federal funding for the
first phase—which includes about 28,000 people—of FamilyCare on October
1, 2002.   Under past law, Medicaid was available to parents and
caretakers with family income at or below 39 percent of the federal
poverty level, which is $558 per month for a family of four.   Phase
one implementation of FamilyCare makes health insurance available to
those with family income at or below 49 percent of the federal poverty
level, which is $739 per month or $8,869 per year for a family of
four.  As of late November 2002, the Illinois Department of Public Aid,
or IDPA, had enrolled about 11,000 people for FamilyCare.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Full implementation.&lt;/strong&gt; In addition to the federal
funds for phase one, the FamilyCare waiver includes a favorable federal
match for state expenditures.  The federal government promises to pay a
65 percent match for most of the expense of expanding the program to
cover people with income up to 185 percent of the poverty level, which
is $2,790 per month or $33,480 per year for a family of four.  This
expansion has the potential to reach 300,000 more adults—ten times the
number covered by the first phase. The federal funds come from the
State Children’s Health Insurance Program, or SCHIP.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Cost to the state.&lt;/strong&gt;  IDPA estimates that the state’s
share of full expansion will cost $66 million; and the federal
contribution covers the total cost, which is about $200 million.  In
the 2004 fiscal year, however, the program  costs only $33 million due
to normal delays in ramping up to full enrollment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These cost figures will fluctuate depending on program enrollment,
but IDPA’s estimates are based on 73 percent of eligible people
actually enrolling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here are seven reasons to implement FamilyCare despite a tight state budget:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1. The FamilyCare waiver provides the state with an unusually good leverage opportunity for federal funds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2. The federal funds come from an allotment already earmarked for
Illinois but were lost because the state did not access it.  Illinois
lost $159 million last September because of underutilization of the
KidCare program.  FamilyCare is a strategy that keeps this federal
money in Illinois.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;3. FamilyCare helps working parents access primary and preventive
health care, which keeps them healthy, productive, and employed.  And
the state saves money over time since, when people lose their job or
have an acute medical need that is avoidable, they depend on other
state programs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4. Employers benefit because workers are more productive. 
FamilyCare also has a premium subsidy option that will help make it
affordable for employees to stay in employer health plans.  Keeping
workers, who are often healthier employees, in their employer health
plan helps the actuarial performance of those plans and thus control
premium increases for all employees.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;5. Children are more likely to be insured and more likely to use primary health care when their parents are insured.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;6. FamilyCare is good for health care providers because it decreases the uncompensated care burden.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;7. This is an ideal initiative for the budget: smart leverage of
federal dollars means help for workers, help for families, and help for
the stressed medical system.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information, contact John Bouman, 312.368.2671 or &lt;a href="mailto:johnbouman@povertylaw.org"&gt;johnbouman@povertylaw.org&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</content>
            

            
                <summary type="html">This article appeared in the March 2003 issue of Illinois Welfare News.</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/mar-2003-iwn"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Governor Makes It Law, Launches FamilyCare and KidCare Expansion</title>
            <updated>2007-08-27T18:58:47Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/july-2003-iwn</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Gov. Rod Blagojevich, joined by both Democrat and Republican
lawmakers, signed on July 1 legislation that expands the FamilyCare and
KidCare health insurance programs. The legislation’s chief sponsors
were Rep. Sandra Pihos (R–Glen Ellyn) and state Sen. Barack Obama
(D–Chicago). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The governor stressed in his remarks at Children’s Memorial Hospital
in Chicago that the expansion of FamilyCare would occur over a
three-year period. He noted that the current state budget crisis made
such an increase in health insurance for low-income working families
even more important. FamilyCare, he said, is one of his core
priorities, and his administration is committed to see through the full
three-year ramp-up of the program.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the first year, the eligibility level for the program is
increased from 49 percent to 90 percent of the federal poverty level
(or about $16,500 for a family of four). The increase extends health
insurance coverage to about 65,000 working parents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The KidCare increase takes full advantage of federal law that allows
states to set eligibility at 200 percent of the federal poverty level.
Illinois had failed to take full advantage of this opportunity because
eligibility had been capped at 185 percent. The governor’s decision
means that health insurance now is available to about 20,000 more
children.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The state investment in health insurance expansion means that it
will leverage a federal contribution, which covers 65 percent of
program cost. Illinois will make full use of these federal funds, which
in previous years had been forfeited and either reallocated to other
states or returned to the federal treasury.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Promoting the programs.&lt;/strong&gt; The expansion of both
programs is effective immediately. The Illinois Department of Public
Aid, or IDPA, which administers KidCare and FamilyCare programs,
intends to enroll automatically approximately 12,000 cases currently
enrolled in a Medicaid “spend down” program. The program had been
available to people within the new FamilyCare eligibility limit. These
families will no longer need to spend down substantial amounts of money
in order to qualify for coverage.   &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FamilyCare applications can be filed at offices of the Illinois
Department of Human Services, or IDHS. KidCare applications can be
filed with application agents throughout Illinois communities. If a
child is already enrolled in KidCare, an eligible parent does not need
to file a new application at an IDHS office; the parent can request by
telephone to be added to the health insurance coverage. IDPA announced
that it would soon expand FamilyCare application procedures to include
the same community-based methods used to enroll children in the KidCare
program. Additional details about KidCare and FamilyCare are available
at &lt;a href="http://www.kidcare.org./"&gt;www.kidcare.org.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a practical matter, the new expansion means that, for income up
to 90 percent of the federal poverty level, FamilyCare has absorbed
KidCare; they are the same, and they cover the whole family. From 90
percent to 200 percent of the federal poverty level, only children are
eligible for KidCare. If adults in the higher-income range need medical
coverage, they can still apply for the “spend down” program; this makes
sense for people with high medical needs even though it requires a
significant monthly contribution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Due to the state’s budget crisis, IDPA does not have a large budget
for outreach efforts to enroll eligible children and families. This
budget decision was part of a trade-off to devote most of the funds to
coverage expansion. Therefore, everyone must assume responsibility to
help extend the outreach effort. At a minimum, all organizations
working with eligible populations should include information about
these health insurance programs in their waiting rooms and
publications. Agencies that can do so should consider a more aggressive
publicity campaign and offer hands-on help. Ideas on how organizations
can help promote the program are available from the Illinois Maternal
and Child Health Coalition (&lt;a href="http://www.ilmaternal.org/"&gt;www.ilmaternal.org&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;</content>
            

            
                <summary type="html">This article appeared in the July 2003 issue of Illinois Welfare News.</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/july-2003-iwn"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>FamilyCare Advocates Must Spread the Word</title>
            <updated>2007-08-27T18:58:48Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/aug-2003-iwn</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Now that FamilyCare, a health insurance program for low-wage parents
who live with their children 18 or younger, is law, every effort must
be made to get people enrolled.  Unfortunately the state has few
resources for an elaborate marketing and outreach plan.  So it is up to
advocates and social service and healthcare providers to promote the
program.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Service providers and others pushing FamilyCare should keep in mind the following eligibility criteria: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;FamilyCare, like KidCare, covers doctor visits, dental care,
specialty medical services, hospital care, emergency services,
prescription drugs and more.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Parents can enroll in the program if they live in Illinois and if
their household income does not exceed 90 percent of the federal
poverty level (see chart).&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Parents must be either U.S. citizens or a permanent legal immigrant who has resided in the United States for five years.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;The program also covers relative caregivers that meet all of the other eligibility conditions.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Parents can apply with a KidCare application agent or by contacting
an Illinois Department of Human Services Local Office.   For more
information, call 866.468.7543 or 877.204.1012 (TTY).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;

&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="center"&gt;Total Family Size, &lt;br /&gt;including parents&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="center"&gt;Monthly Income equal to or less than: &lt;br /&gt;90% of federal poverty level&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="center"&gt;2&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="right"&gt;$909&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="center"&gt;3&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="right"&gt;$1,145&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="center"&gt;4&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="right"&gt;$1,380&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="center"&gt;5&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;
&lt;div align="right"&gt;$1,616&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Report: Good economic times not so good for young men&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In its report “Boom Times: a Bust for Less Educated Young Men,” the
Center for Law and Social Policy, or CLASP, reports that men 18 to 24
with a high school diploma or less were less likely to work in 1999
than in 1979, another period of economic growth.  CLASP also reports
that African American men in the same age group were even worse off. 
The employment rate for African American men dropped 13 percentage
points, from 66 percent to 53 percent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In response to the grim data, CLASP recommends an expansion of the
Earned Income Tax Credit, increasing the minimum wage, setting more
realistic child support orders by states, public jobs for youths, more
quality job training programs, and improving pre- and postrelease
assistance for prisoners.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A copy of the report can be found at &lt;a href="http://www.clasp.org/"&gt;www.clasp.org&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;California program evaluated &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Economic Roundtable, a private nonprofit organization located in
Los Angeles, recently released a report, “Prisoners of Hope,” an
evaluation of the Los Angeles County welfare program, Greater Avenues
to Independence, or GAIN.  The program was one model for the 1996
federal welfare reform law.  The report includes the following
recommendations:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Promote community college, adult education, or vocational training.&lt;/em&gt; 
The evaluators found that parents who participated in education and
training increased their earnings by 46 percent up to three years after
entering the labor force.  However, even though half of welfare parents
in the county are in need of a high school diploma or English skills,
these parents were twice as likely to be sent to “Job Club” (three
weeks of motivation and job search program) than education or training
programs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Almost half of GAIN participants entering the labor force between
1998 and 2001 had no earnings in 2001; 85 percent were poor by federal
standards.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Identify and serve welfare recipients with domestic violence, mental health, or substance abuse problems.&lt;/em&gt; 
The participants with one or more of these barriers were twice as
likely to be sent to “Job Club” than referred to clinical services, and
four times as many were sanctioned than completed clinical treatment. 
These parents also were the lowest earners with an average income of
$2,950 in the year 2001.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Screen all parents who have used half of their lifetime limit on
welfare for domestic violence, mental health, substance abuse, and
disabilities, and provide appropriate clinical services and exemptions
from time limits. &lt;/em&gt;Sixty-five percent of parents reaching the
five-year time limit had one or more major barriers to employment, with
a growing proportion of disabled recipients expected to reach the time
limit by 2005.  Parents projected to reach the time limit between 2003
and 2005 had an average earned income of $5,391 in 2001.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;“Prisoners of Hope” can be found at &lt;a href="http://www.economicrt.org/"&gt;www.economicrt.org&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</content>
            

            
                <summary type="html">This article appeared in the August 2003 issue of Illinois Welfare News.</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/aug-2003-iwn"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Second Chance at KidCare, FamilyCare Funds</title>
            <updated>2007-08-27T18:58:48Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/oct-2003-iwn</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Congress in August passed a bill allowing states a second chance to
use funds that had been allocated to them under the State Children’s
Health Insurance Program, or SCHIP, known in Illinois as KidCare and
FamilyCare. Illinois and most other states had forfeited these funds by
failing to spend them on children’s health insurance. The bill makes
these forfeited funds available for another year if the states can draw
them down and use them. Illinois gets a second chance to spend $89
million that it had forfeited.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SCHIP allots to the states annual federal funds at highly favorable
matching rates. For Illinois, this matching rate is 65 percent,
compared to the standard Medicaid matching rate of 50 percent. For
every dollar that KidCare and FamilyCare cost, the federal government
pays $0.65 from the state’s SCHIP allotment. However, the states must
spend each year’s allotment within three years, or else it is
reallocated to other states that have spent their allotments. Anything
left over reverts to the federal treasury.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SCHIP began in federal fiscal year 1998. The states had until the
end of the 2000 federal fiscal year  to spend their 1998 allotment.
They had until the end of the 2001 fiscal year to spend the 1999
allotment; until the end of the 2002 fiscal year to spend the 2000
allotment; and until the end of the 2003 fiscal year (September 30) to
spend the 2001 allotment. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The problem. &lt;/strong&gt;Illinois and many other states could
not spend their allotments within the three years. In the case of
Illinois, this was because (1) Illinois had a slow start enrolling
children in KidCare and so spent the funds slowly at first and (2),
more important, the SCHIP formula allotted to Illinois more funds than
Illinois could spend on children alone. That is why Illinois had plenty
of SCHIP funds available to fund the FamilyCare program, and why the
federal government granted the FamilyCare waiver for Illinois to use
these funds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What the bill does.&lt;/strong&gt; The “SCHIP fix” allows states a
second chance to spend the 1998 and 1999 fiscal year funds that they
forfeited to the federal treasury (not the funds already reallocated to
other states). They may keep half of their unspent 2000 fiscal year
funds (which originally would have been forfeited last year but had
been temporarily preserved while Congress debated the “SCHIP fix”). And
they will have another year to spend 2001 fiscal year funds that they
are scheduled to forfeit at the end of September 2003. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What Illinois gets. &lt;/strong&gt;The bottom line is that
Illinois regains access to $20.3 million in forfeited 1998 and 1999
fiscal year funds and $68.7 million of unspent 2000 fiscal year funds.
This total of $89 million must be spent by September 30, 2004, or it
will be lost permanently. Illinois has until September 30, 2005, to
spend half of the 2001 fiscal year funds—tens of millions of
dollars—that it would have forfeited at the end of September 2003.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How Illinois can use it. &lt;/strong&gt;The challenge for Illinois
is to find ways quickly to access this valuable lode of federal funds
for health insurance. One is to maximize enrollment in KidCare and
FamilyCare as quickly as possible. Another is to prompt families
aggressively to bring their children to the doctor for needed
well-child examinations and health screens and any resulting treatment.
Illinois can also consider speeding up the FamilyCare phase-in. This
year Gov. Rod Blagojevich promised to move FamilyCare eligibility up to
185 percent of the federal poverty level over the next two years. If he
did it all in next year’s budget, Illinois would have a better chance
to access SCHIP funds. Illinois could consider increasing KidCare
eligibility beyond the current 200 percent of the federal poverty
level. The budget crisis, of course, makes these last two suggestions
difficult, but full utilization of highly favorable federal matching
funds for a valuable program is well worth considering.&lt;/p&gt;
For more information, contact John Bouman, &lt;a href="mailto:johnbouman@povertylaw.org"&gt;johnbouman@povertylaw.org&lt;/a&gt;.</content>
            

            
                <summary type="html">The following article appeared in the October 2003 issue of Illinois Welfare News.</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/oct-2003-iwn"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>Governor's Budget Proposal Includes FamilyCare Expansion: Fills $1.7 Billion Deficit Without Cuts in Health Care Programs</title>
            <updated>2007-08-27T18:58:48Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/mar-2004-iwn</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Despite the ongoing state budget crisis, Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s
budget proposal includes an increase of the FamilyCare eligibility
level. This would qualify an additional 77,000 parents for FamilyCare,
a health insurance program for parents of children already covered by
KidCare or Medicaid.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Illinois officials received federal permission in 2002 to expend
federal matching monies for FamilyCare. The program can potentially
serve working parents who earn up to 185 percent of the federal poverty
level. Before FamilyCare, working parents had to have income less than
39 percent of the poverty level to enroll in state-sponsored health
insurance plans. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Governor Blagojevich, who promised to implement FamilyCare fully
over a three-year period, increased eligibility last year to 90 percent
of the poverty level. This year he proposes increasing the eligibility
level to 133 percent of the poverty level, or just over $25,000 per
year for a family of four. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The governor also has reiterated his promise to complete full
implementation of FamilyCare in 2005, when eligibility rises to 185
percent of the poverty level.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;No cuts in health care programs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The governor’s budget plan does not cut reimbursement rates for care
provided through state health care programs such as KidCare and
Medicaid. Neither does the plan constrict eligibility for these
programs. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead the Blagojevich administration hopes to make it easier for
parents to enroll children in KidCare. The governor is proceeding with
efforts to simplify KidCare application by requiring applicants to
submit only one payroll receipt as verification of income. The program
currently requires a full month of income documentation. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last year Illinois was one of a few states not to cut health care
funding in the face of major budget deficits. The governor’s plan, if
approved, would continue this distinction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Increased funding for child care and job training; major change proposed for private human service providers&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The governor’s budget proposal adds close to $27 million to the
child care subsidy program. This annualizes an increase enacted last
year but not paid for the full year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proposal also would appropriate $3.5 million for two programs
for employer-based job training for low-income workers. The programs
will be funded at  $5 million.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The governor also proposes fee-for-service contracts, rather than
grants, for private human service agencies. Several of the larger
private agencies receiving grants from the state are negotiating the
details of this proposal. One reason for this proposed change is that
it will enable the state to claim federal Medicaid matching funds for
several types of service.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Balancing the budget&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The governor’s plan fills a $1.7 billion budget gap through cuts in
some programs such as tourism and Open Lands and through further
reduction of the state bureaucracy. He also proposes closing several
business tax loopholes; this proposal may save millions of dollars. The
extreme example of such loopholes is a sales tax exemption for
businesses that purchase luxury yachts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The budget proposal depends on income from the new—yet
unsold—riverboat gambling license. The proposal also assumes revenues
of several hundred million dollars from a “hospital assessment” plan
enacted in last fall’s veto session but not yet approved by the federal
government.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information, contact John Bouman, &lt;a href="mailto:johnbouman@povertylaw.org"&gt;johnbouman@povertylaw.org&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</content>
            

            
                <summary type="html">The following article appeared in the March 2004 issue of Illinois Welfare News.</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/mar-2004-iwn"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>State Budget Remains in Limbo: Fight for Crucial Antipoverty Programs Continues in New Fiscal Year</title>
            <updated>2007-08-27T18:58:48Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/july-2004-iwn</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;Illinois lawmakers wrapped up the scheduled Spring legislative
session at the end of May without a new budget. To now pass a spending
plan, 60 percent of legislators in both houses must agree, which means
votes from both parties are needed. State lawmakers did not agree on a
budget in June, because Democrats could not agree among themselves and
Republicans have injected new issues to the debate. The bottom-line:
Illinois entered the new fiscal year on July 1 without a complete
budget in place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Stop-gap prevents general shutdown, but hurts key programs&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The General Assembly did manage to pass a one-month operating budget
to avoid a major government shutdown.  Medicaid coverage and need-based
cash assistance programs can continue operating without interruption,
because of a court order obtained 11 years ago during the last budget
impasse; the Shriver Center reminded state officials of this court
order in June to assure continued assistance. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Still the July stop-gap budget contains only funds for “core”
services—it includes only two-thirds of the money that would be in a
regular budget; and, it includes no funding for new programs. In
addition, severely damaged are crucial community services, which
private agencies provide through contracts.  Such services include
welfare-to-work, homeless prevention, substance abuse treatment,
immigrant services, teen parent programs.  The stop-gap measure
appropriates no money for these services, and state agencies cannot
contract with providers without them.  Technically, the temporary
budget does empower a state agency to transfer funds from other budget
lines to cover contracts it deems important enough to fund in July, yet
realistically, few contracts are expected.  Therefore, many social
service providers have to find a way to “carry” the programs or shut
them down indefinitely.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The stop-gap budget is only effective during July.  By the end of
the month, everyone hopes that lawmakers will enact a regular full-year
2005 budget plan.  If lawmakers fail, they must consider another
stop-gap measure for August.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Debate involves crucial priorities&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The state budget contains issues of immense importance to low-income
people.  Gov. Rod Blagojevich proposed increased spending for Medicaid
(7 percent, compared to 13-14 percent inflation nationwide in private
health insurance), FamilyCare (year two of a three year plan to fully
implement the program), child care (annualizing a change that actually
was enacted last year by unanimous votes in both chambers), early
childhood education (also the second year of a prior commitment), basic
state aid for local schools, and a number of other programs.  These are
core priorities for the governor, most Democrats, and some
Republicans.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There also is a consensus among leadership that state government
must cutback; for example a 3.5 or 4 percent across-the-board reduction
for state agencies is one idea, another is to close certain state
prisons or other facilities.  There appears, however, to be no
consensus on the exact lineup of such austerity measures; for example,
what programs shall be exempt from cuts, and what facilities to close?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Problem is revenue&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With a revenue shortfall of over $2 billion, the most serious
disagreement is over how to fund the final spending plan.  While
lawmakers and the governor have floated many ideas on how to raise the
money, there is still no agreement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The governor, whom Senate Democrats generally support, has proposed
a revenue plan that includes closing corporate tax loopholes, using
special state funds that remain unspent, and borrowing.  House
Democrats, most of whom generally support the governor’s spending plan,
want to borrow less and close fewer corporate loopholes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And since the governor strongly opposes a tax increase and has yet
to propose alternatives, the current position of House Democrats is to
oppose some or all spending, although there is no unified caucus
position. The caucus, in fact, has continually provided core support
for the governor’s spending initiatives.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Although House Republicans appear willing to compromise, Senate
Republicans will not support a revenue increase to cover a spending
increase no matter the importance of a service or if it was clearly
promised in the past. It looks as if Senate Republicans will insist on
reducing spending to match existing revenue; they however have not
stated which populations or services would be cut.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some lawmakers have injected huge and controversial non-monetary
issues into the budget negotiations.  For example, one such bargaining
chip would enact reforms to reduce medical malpractice premiums by
limiting damage awards for injured patients.  Another would affect
state-mandated health insurance provisions, which require Illinois
policies to include coverage for breast and cervical cancer screens,
mental health coverage, family planning services, and other care.  The
proposal is still to require employers to offer policies that include
all mandated services, but also to allow them to offer policies with
either some or none of such services.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Health care dominoes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The budget dispute has snarled Medicaid, KidCare, and FamilyCare at
many levels.  The state last year approved a plan to assess hospitals
and circulate the proceeds through the Medicaid program to draw federal
matching funds to maintain and increase health care statewide.  At
stake is $500 million—money already assumed in this year’s budget.  The
plan must get federal approval, and the federal officials require
states to demonstrate clearly that they will use these funds to
maintain or expand health care services.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The governor’s budget plan does so because it does not reduce
eligibility guidelines for, or cut services under, current health
programs, and it also contains a Medicaid increase to keep pace with
inflation.  In addition, the FamilyCare expansion provides the
necessary proof that Illinois is actually expanding care rather than
using the hospital assessment plan to close budget holes. Thus, the
governor’s health care budget not only funds important priorities, but
also is essential to win approval for the hospital assessment plan.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Moreover, in its own right FamilyCare is an excellent leverage of
federal funds. Federal funds cover 65 percent of the cost to expand
FamilyCare. Furthermore, if Illinois does not use the federal money
available for FamilyCare, the money returns to the federal government
and other states will use it to insure their residents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Maintain pressure&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The governor’s spending plan hits the right priorities. It includes
targeted expansion, holds the line on crucial services, and maximizes
the draw-down of federal money. Now he and state lawmakers have to
create a revenue plan to cover it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are not ordinary times. The Blagojevich administration began
last year in the teeth of a historic state fiscal crisis, already a
couple of years in progress.  Illinois has an antiquated and inadequate
revenue system that is unable to fund crucial state services even in
good times.  The recession has both exposed and deepened this flaw.
Considerable reform of the income, sales and property tax system is
necessary to avoid an annual budget crisis and to create a system more
aligned with the modern economy.  Since such reform is unlikely in an
election year, new and the expansion of old (gaming) revenue ideas are
under consideration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is understandable that all the players in state government are
struggling this year to find ways to shore up revenues so that
excellent policy priorities, which most support and their constituents
demand, can move forward.  Now is the time for our leaders to select
adequate revenues from their menu of choices and then enact a spending
plan that includes these priorities. After that, it is essential for
responsible leader to address significant reform of the Illinois
revenue system.&lt;/p&gt;</content>
            

            
                <summary type="html">This article appeared in the July 2004 issue of Illinois Welfare News.</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/july-2004-iwn"/>
        
    </entry>
    <entry>
        

            <title>New FamilyCare Income Guidelines</title>
            <updated>2007-08-27T18:58:48Z</updated>
            <id>http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/aug-2004-iwn</id>
            <author>
                <name>michellenicolet</name>
            </author>

            
                <content type="html">&lt;p&gt;The Illinois Department of Public Aid has confirmed that the
effective date for the increase in eligibility for FamilyCare from 90
percent to 133 percent of the federal poverty level is September 1. The
department intends to automatically enroll all the parents already on
“spenddown” Medicaid that are within the new income guidelines—some
20,000 parents. This means that such parents, who currently pay an
amount every month to meet their “spend-down” before they are covered
by Medicaid, will now be covered without any charge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As for additional enrollment, it is up to all of service providers
and advocates. Please identify eligible families and encourage them to
enroll.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new income guidelines (by family size) are:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table&gt;

&lt;tbody&gt;&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;2 person:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$16,612 (annual); $1,384 (monthly)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;3 person:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$20,841 (annual); $1,698 (monthly)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;4 person:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$25,071 (annual); $2,089 (monthly)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;
&lt;td&gt;5 person:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td&gt;$29,300 (annual); $2,442 (monthly)&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/tbody&gt;&lt;/table&gt;
Details about FamilyCare enrollment are on the IDPA website at &lt;a href="http://www.kidcareillinois.com/"&gt;www.kidcareillinois.com&lt;/a&gt;. As &lt;em&gt;Illinois Welfare News&lt;/em&gt; goes to press, the old income guidelines remain on the IDPA website (but it should change on or around September 1).&lt;br /&gt;Stay
tuned later in the year for action steps on the final year of the
FamilyCare rollout—expansion to 185 percent of the poverty level in
next year’s budget.</content>
            

            
                <summary type="html">The following article appeared in the August 2004 issue of Illinois Welfare News.</summary>
            

            <link rel="alternate"
                  href="http://www.povertylaw.org/advocacy/health/family-care-articles/aug-2004-iwn"/>
        
    </entry>

</feed>


